ArticleNutrition reviews2026
Understanding Research Approaches to Assess Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxation Policy Implementation and Response in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Results From a Scoping Review.
Article in Nutrition reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Intensification, Beverage Affordability, and Food-Security Safeguards: Global Evidence from 2022-2024.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Potential effects of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation on oral and systemic health outcomes.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Trends in sugar-sweetened beverage prices, sales, and elasticities: policy evidence from WHO regions, 2010-2024.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Implementing sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxation policies presents significant challenges in practice, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where resources and capacity are often limited. Expanding the evidence base and knowledge on policy implementation and responses is crucial to identifying key drivers and barriers, as well as developing effective systems for monitoring and evaluation. This study aimed to identify the research approaches used to assess and analyze SSB tax policy implementation and responses at the national level. A scoping review was conducted, drawing on relevant literature from 5 databases-Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Global Health, and CINAHL-covering publications from 2014 to 2023 inclusive. A total of 24 studies were included in the analysis. Two qualitative studies on policy implementation revealed limitations related to data access, with reliance on publicly available information. The remaining 22 studies, focusing on policy responses, primarily used quantitative methods to evaluate the reactions of industry, retailers, and consumers in terms of price adjustments, purchasing behavior, and consumption patterns. While there is substantial documentation on tax design and structure, enforcement dynamics, stakeholder interactions, and the complexities of policy implementation remain underexplored. This review highlights a critical gap in the research on the multifaceted nature of policy implementation and response. Future studies should prioritize these dynamics and adopt innovative methodologies to enhance the effectiveness of SSB taxation policies and public health interventions in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.