ArticleSubstance use & addiction journal2025
Creating a Classification System of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Policies: A Research Protocol.
Article in Substance use & addiction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The opioid-related overdose crisis remains a public health priority in the United States. A key component of initiatives to mitigate this crisis are policies that aim to improve equitable access to effective treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD). To facilitate this goal, it is crucial to effectively use and build upon evidence from existing studies evaluating the effectiveness of OUD treatment policies, though assessing the effectiveness of policies is challenging in part due to bespoke differences in how researchers define and categorize policies. This project aimed to improve addiction research through the development of an evidence- and consensus-based classification system for OUD treatment policies. The development of this classification system will take place in 5 steps. The first step will involve a review of existing policy classification systems to create a synthesized list of labels, definitions, and relational structure for OUD treatment policies. The second step will involve a refinement of this list through examining policy labels and definitions in existing empirical studies of OUD treatment policies, with discussion and revision of the list throughout this process. The third step will involve an online expert feedback exercise on the clarity, uniqueness, and completeness of the refined classification system. The fourth step will involve reliability testing of the classification system on existing policies to examine the interrater reliability across different areas of OUD treatment policy. The fifth step will involve a sorting task to place the OUD treatment policies into final categories. A unified classification system of OUD treatment policies can facilitate comprehensive and systematic assessments of what we know from existing empirical research, identify gaps in policy approaches, inform data collection efforts, improve future scientific evaluations, and help policymakers make more informed decisions about which policies are high-value for specific outcomes in specific populations and contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.