Observational studyStroke2025
Rural and Urban Disparities in Access to Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Vessel Occlusions in Colorado.
Observational study in Stroke, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social determinants of health and stroke care and outcomes: SEQUINS lecture 2025.Equity neuroscience · 2026Article
- Vascular geometry characterization for AI-based endovascular navigation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRural-urban disparities in access to acute stroke care exist and have widened over time. We sought to quantify the rural-urban disparities that may exist in access to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for patients experiencing strokes with large vessel occlusions in Colorado.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study looking at all Colorado residents aged ≥18 years with large vessel occlusions undergoing EVT, between January 1, 2015, and November 30, 2022. Eleven sites performed EVTs in Colorado during the study period, and each site submitted data independently to the coordinating center. Rural designation at the patient level was defined as either (1) the patient first presented to a rural hospital or (2) the patient lived in a rural area based on their 5-digit residential zip code. Primary outcomes include time from last known normal to groin puncture and unfavorable outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score >2 at discharge. Secondary outcomes include the length of stay and whether the patient was discharged home.
resultsA total of 3100 patients were included in the study: 346 (11%) rural and 2754 (89%) urban patients. The adjusted geometric mean time from last known normal to EVT in rural patients was 6.0 (95% CI, 4.6-7.9) hours compared with 4.5 (95% CI, 3.5-5.8) hours for urban patients. Rural patients took 33.3% (
conclusionsRural patients experienced longer time to intervention and had worse outcomes after a stroke with large vessel occlusions. Each rural patient with large vessel occlusions lost ≈1.7 years of disability-free life compared with an urban patient with the same severity stroke. More work needs to be done to identify and quantify the sources of delay for rural patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.