SynthesisJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Applications of Traditional Herbal Ingredients in Skincare: Mapping the Research Landscape and Innovation Trajectories Over Four Decades.
Synthesis in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications of Traditional Herbal Ingredients in Skincare: Mapping the Research Landscape and Innovation Trajectories Over Four Decades.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Pooled it
- Pathway and Mechanism for the Biodegradation of Inosine and Guanosine byFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Botanical and Upcycled Bioactives for Advanced Topical Formulations: Mechanistic Pathways, Cutaneous Delivery, and Sustainability-by-Design.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAlong with economic and technological advancements, traditional herbal ingredients have garnered increasing attention in skincare due to their antioxidative properties, low toxicity, multitargeted effects, and broad cultural acceptance. However, there remains a lack of comprehensive knowledge frameworks and systematic research trend analyses in this field. This study examines the scientific landscape and innovation patterns of herbal skincare, aiming to establish a framework for integrating traditional wisdom with modern dermatological science.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection (SCI-E). CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and ArcGIS were employed to analyze leading contributors, research trends, and thematic evolutions.
resultsThe analysis yielded 1593 papers authored by 753 researchers from 507 institutions across 102 countries. China emerged as the top contributor, while Industrial Crops and Products was the most highly cited journal, and Zengin, Gokhan, was the most prolific author. Geographical clustering and cultural convergence characterized the distribution of countries, institutions, and authors. Keyword clustering identified 20 research networks, with recent clusters including #6 "molecular docking," #7 "chromatography-mass spectrometry," and #15 "mixture design." Persistently trending keywords included "Mechanism," "Gut microbiota," "Network pharmacology," and "Association."
conclusionResearch on herbal skincare has evolved from raw plant usage to advanced refinement techniques, spanning animal, cellular, and molecular studies, including high-throughput screening approaches. Formulations have progressed from complex mixtures to single-compound extractions and bioactive monomers. A comprehensive research system has been established, yet standardization in dosage, application, and manufacturing remains crucial. Future studies should prioritize multicenter clinical trials and evidence-based validation. This study highlights the transition from empirical herbal applications to precision skincare, advocating for global collaboration between traditional medicine and modern regulatory science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.