Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40686045›Full record

ArticleCNS spectrums2025

Adherence to medical recommendations in high-risk pregnancy: dispositional and situational predictors with a focus on emotional reactivity.

Manuel Glauco Carbone, Concetta Polizzi, Maria Maddalena Di Pasqua, Maria Regina Morales, Giovanna Perricone, Gaspare Cucinella, Rosalia Sutera, Sofia Burgio, Giulia Giordano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS spectrums, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Manuel Glauco CarboneDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine and Surgery, https://ror.org/00s409261University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7457-6008
Concetta PolizziDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science, and Human Movement (SPPEFF), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Maria Maddalena Di PasquaItalian Society of Pediatric Psychology (S.I.P.Ped), Rome, Italy.
Maria Regina MoralesDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine and Surgery, https://ror.org/00s409261University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Giovanna PerriconeItalian Society of Pediatric Psychology (S.I.P.Ped), Rome, Italy.
Gaspare CucinellaDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, V. Cervello Hospital, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Rosalia SuteraItalian Society of Pediatric Psychology (S.I.P.Ped), Rome, Italy.
Sofia BurgioMaternal and Child Health Department, V. Cervello Hospital, Palermo, Italy.
Giulia GiordanoDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science, and Human Movement (SPPEFF), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTherapeutic adherence during pregnancy is critical for maternal and fetal health. This study examines personality traits, sensitivity to stimuli and socio-demographic factors influencing adherence among Italian women with high-risk pregnancies.

methodsNinety women from "Villa Sofia-V. Cervello Hospital", in Palermo, Italy, participated. Personality traits were assessed via the Personality Inventory (PI), covering Extraversion, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, Mental Openness, and Friendliness. Sensitivity to stimuli was evaluated using the Highly Sensitive Person (HSP) Scale, which includes Low Sensory Threshold (LST), Ease of Excitement (EOE), and Aesthetic Sensitivity (AES). Treatment adherence was measured using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS).

resultsConscientiousness was identified as a positive predictor of medication adherence (OR = 1.08, p = .010), while Mental Openness (OR = 0.81, p = .003) and EOE (OR = 0.92, p = .014) were negative predictors. Higher education levels were associated with better adherence (OR = 2.34, p = .006). Significant occupational differences emerged, with office clerks exhibiting higher adherence compared to housekeepers (OR = 3.18, p = .008). Planned (OR = 0.38, p = .025) and unplanned but wanted pregnancies (OR = 0.42, p = .045) showed lower adherence. Regression analysis indicated that Neuroticism (β = -0.21, p = .032) and EOE (β = -0.28, p = .008) negatively impacted adherence.

conclusionSpecific personality traits, sensitivity, education, occupation, and pregnancy significantly influence adherence. Tailored interventions that enhance conscientiousness, address mental openness and sensitivity, and consider individual socio-demographic context are needed to promote better adherence and improve maternal and fetal health outcomes in high-risk pregnancies.

Indexed as

EmotionsMedication AdherencePersonalityPregnancy, High-RiskAdultFemaleHumansItalyPersonality InventoryPregnancyYoung Adulthigh-risk pregnancymedication adherencepersonality traitspregnancy intentionsensory processing sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID40686045
PMCPMC13064701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.