Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40686005›Full record

Trial reportThe Prostate2025

Prognostic Impact of Lymph Node Yield in a Phase III Clinical Trial (NRG/RTOG 9601) of Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Salvage Radiation Following Prostatectomy.

Emily Chan, Stephanie L Pugh, Jeffry P Simko, Felix Feng, William U Shipley, Himanshu R Lukka, Jean-Paul Bahary, Thomas M Pisansky, Kenneth Lee Zeitzer, Elizabeth Gore and 10 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Prostate, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Emily ChanUniversity of San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Stephanie L PughNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jeffry P SimkoUniversity of San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Felix FengUniversity of San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
William U ShipleyMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Himanshu R LukkaJuravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.
Jean-Paul BaharyCentre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Thomas M PisanskyMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Kenneth Lee ZeitzerThomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Elizabeth GoreThe Medical College of Wisconsin and Milwaukee VAMC, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7807-9060
Jason A EfstathiouMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Seth A RosenthalSutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services, Roseville, California, USA.
Alexander G BaloghTom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada.
Richard D LovettRutland Regional Medical Center, Rutland, Vermont, USA.
Anthony WongUniversity of San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Robert T DessUniversity of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2331-3758
L Scott McGinnisNovant Health Presbyterian Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Michael KuettelRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Luda DeMoraNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Howard M SandlerCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI James J. Dignam, GREG YOTHERS · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
NRG Oncology Biospecimen BankU24CA196067 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Tanner J. Freeman, Nilsa Del Carmen Ramirez Milan · 2015 to 2026
$42.6M
UM LAPs -UG1 GrantUG1CA233160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ANNE F SCHOTT · 2019 to 2026
$5.4M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196067NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233160This project was supported by grants UG1CA189867 (NCORP), U10CA180868 (NRG Oncology Operations), U24CA196067 (NRG Specimen Bank) from the National Cancer Institute (NCI).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aim to evaluate whether increased lymph node yield at prostatectomy (RP) is associated with improved outcomes in NRG/RTOG 9601, a randomized clinical trial of men who underwent either radiation (RT) alone or RT + bicalutamide for PSA elevation following RP for pT2/T3 prostate cancer.

methodsWe reviewed available pathology reports for patients in NRG/RTOG 9601 to determine the nodal count at RP. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess effect of lymph nodes yield, arm (RT alone or RT + bicalutamide), Gleason score, positive margins, and seminal vesicle invasion on the following endpoints: times to local and distant failure and overall and disease-specific survival.

resultsOf 760 patients, 552 (73%, 276 in each arm) had complete data available. Median node count in the entire cohort was 6 (range: 0-33, IQR: 3-9). There were no significant differences between arms in terms of patient demographic or clinical characteristics, including total lymph nodes removed in either arm. There was no significant association between total lymph nodes and overall or disease-specific survival with both arms combined and when adjusting for arm. Notably, interaction analysis revealed that in seminal vesicle invasion, there was a significant association between lymph node yield and OS and DSS (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.83-0.99, p = 0.034; HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77-0.99, p = 0.029, respectively).

conclusionsAlthough lymph node yield in NRG/RTOG 9601 did not show association with adverse outcomes in the entire cohort or either arm alone, there was significant association between lymph node yield and adverse outcomes when seminal vesicle invasion was present. The therapeutic benefit of extensive lymph node dissection remains uncertain but could be more relevant in higher risk patients.

Indexed as

Lymph NodesProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsSalvage TherapyAgedAndrogen AntagonistsAnilidesHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedNitrilesPrognosisTosyl CompoundsAndrogen AntagonistsAnilidesbicalutamideNitrilesTosyl Compoundslymph nodepelvic lymph node dissectionprognosisprostate cancerprostatectomyradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40686005
PMCPMC12366761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.