Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40685915›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2025

Revisiting 15 000 hours: towards sustainable school systems for mental health, well-being and learning.

Susan M Sawyer, Monika Raniti, Rohan Borschmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susan M SawyerCentre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute and Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9095-358X
Monika RanitiCentre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute and Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0099-9905
Rohan BorschmannCentre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute and Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0365-7775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An independent evaluation of The Resilience Project's School Partnership Program in Australian secondary schools found that longer participation (6+ years) in this whole-school programme was associated with improved student outcomes, including reduced symptoms of depression and anxiety. This commentary aims to: (a) describe whole-school approaches to improving health and well-being, with reference to their historical context and some selected key studies; (b) highlight the lack of data on the effectiveness of whole-school approaches for reducing depression and anxiety; (c) signal the potential benefits of whole-school approaches when sustainably implemented; and (d) reinforce the need for research that examines links between implementation factors and outcomes. Overall, this commentary underscores the value of viewing schools as complex social systems where multiple components can align to enhance mental health and well-being outcomes for students.

Indexed as

comprehensive school healthhealth promoting schoolshealth promotionMental healthschools

Identifiers

PMID40685915
PMCPMC12303833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.