Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40685771›Full record

SynthesisHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia2025

Measuring Physical Function Capacity in Persons With Haemophilia: A Systematic Review of Performance-Based Methods.

Catherine Holdsworth, Melanie Bladen, Hannah Harbidge, Wendy Drechsler, Ryan Mahaffey, Sofia Perez-Alenda, Fionnuala Sayers, Karen Strike, Merel Timmer, David Stephensen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Measuring Physical Function Capacity in Persons With Haemophilia: A Systematic Review of Performance-Based Methods.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Catherine HoldsworthUniversity Hospitals Dorset, Bournemouth UK/Southern Haemophilia Network, Poole, UK.
Melanie BladenGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7413-1906
Hannah HarbidgeEast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK.
Wendy DrechslerEast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK.
Ryan MahaffeyFaculty of Sport, Technology and Health Sciences, St Mary's University, London, UK.
Sofia Perez-AlendaFaculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0841-5767
Fionnuala SayersBelfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK.
Karen StrikeFaculty of Health Sciences, Rehabilitation Science, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5598-2051
Merel TimmerUniversity Medical Center, van Creveldkliniek, Utrect, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1910-999X
David StephensenFaculty of Medicine, Health and Social Care, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6175-3343

Funding

European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrently, physical health assessments in persons with haemophilia focus on bleed-related events and after-effects. The aim of the systematic review was to review and apply standardised criteria to evaluate reliability, responsiveness and construct validity of performance-based instruments evaluating physical capability in persons with haemophilia.

methodsMedline, CINAHL, Embase, EMCARE, and Cochrane (inception-March 2024) were searched using COSMIN filters for 7 performance-based tests in haemophilia, supplemented by manual searches. Reliability, responsiveness and construct validity of the six-minute walk test (6MWT), timed up and go test (TUG), timed up and down stairs (TUDS), 30-second sit-to-stand (30-STS), single leg stance (SLS), tandem stance (TS) and single hop for distance (SH) were evaluated.

resultsThe search yielded 88 abstracts; 25 studies remained after full-text screening, covering 5 of 7 performance-based instruments: 6MWT, TUG, TUDS, SLS, and 30-STS. No performance-based test was evaluated for all properties across all ages. Only TUG in adults and older adults and 6MWT in children and adolescents has been tested for all properties. No test received a high grading. Low and very low grades were given mostly for indeterminate results, small or single studies and lack of a similar construct of comparator. The 6MWT in all age groups was the only performance-based test graded moderate, and this was for responsiveness.

conclusionWith increasing use of performance-based methods of physical function capacity, evaluating measurement properties is a priority. Until evidence is generated, we can only advocate the 6MWT to monitor responsiveness in adult persons with haemophilia affected with marked arthropathy. SUMMARY: Understanding Physical Health in People with Haemophilia Currently, when we check the physical health of people with haemophilia, we mostly look at problems caused by bleeding. But we wanted to see if there are better ways to measure how well people with haemophilia can move and do daily activities. What We Did We looked through a lot of medical studies (up to March 2024) to find information on 7 specific physical tests. These tests measure things like: How far someone can walk in six minutes (6-minute walk test or 6MWT) How long it takes to stand up, walk a short distance, and sit down (Timed Up and Go test or TUG) How long it takes to go up and down stairs (timed up and down stairs or TUDS) How many times someone can stand up from a chair in 30 seconds (30-second sit-to-stand or 30-STS) How long someone can stand on one leg (single leg stance or SLS) How long someone can stand with one foot directly in front of the other (Tandem Stance or TS) How far someone can hop on one leg (single hop for distance or SH) We wanted to see how reliable (consistent), responsive (can detect changes), and valid (measures what it's supposed to) these tests were for people with haemophilia. What We Found We found 25 studies that looked at 5 of the 7 tests (6MWT, TUG, TUDS, SLS, and 30-STS). Here's what stood out: No single test was good for everything and for all ages. Only the TUG test (for adults) and the 6MWT (for children) had been fully studied for all aspects (reliability, responsiveness, and validity). None of the tests were rated as highly effective overall. Most got low ratings because the results weren't clear, studies were small, or there wasn't enough good information to compare them to. The 6MWT was the only test that received a 'moderate' rating, but only for its ability to show changes in all age groups. What This Means It's becoming more common to use these kinds of physical tests to understand how well people function. So, it's very important to know if these tests work well for people with haemophilia. For now, based on the evidence, we can only suggest using the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) to track how much someone's physical ability changes over time, especially for adults with haemophilia who have severe joint problems. We need more research to find better tests.

Indexed as

Hemophilia APhysical Functional PerformanceAdolescentAdultChildHumansReproducibility of Resultscore outcome sethaemophiliajoint healthmusculoskeletalphysical capacityphysical functionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40685771
PMCPMC12462580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.