ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2025
Bring It Down: A Formative Evaluation of Reach and Effectiveness of a Blood Pressure Reduction Program in Detroit, Michigan USA.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chronic Uncontrolled Hypertension in the ED-We Hold This Truth to Be Self Evident.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hypertension is the most important contributor to the development of cardiovascular disease. The objective of the Bring it Down program was to examine the reach and effectiveness of linkage to primary care via community health workers (CHWs) to improve blood pressure control among people with undiagnosed or uncontrolled hypertension. Adults with systolic blood pressures ≥130 mmHg were initially recruited from four urban emergency departments that serve high-risk, socially vulnerable populations. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we also enrolled participants in the community who presented to mobile health units. CHWs facilitated follow-up blood pressure assessment within 1 year. Of 153 630 ED patient encounters during the evaluation period, 61% were eligible to participate in the BID program; of these, 3% were approached, and 16% (395/2476) agreed to participate. Compared to ED encounters, fewer patients presenting to MHUs were eligible to participate (42%, 1780/4211), all of whom were approached, and 7% (124/1780) agreed to participate in the BID program. Among participants with at least one follow-up encounter (n = 158), there was a statistically significant reduction in mean systolic BP (mean difference: -16 mmHg, 99% confidence intervals (CI): -21, -12 mmHg) with a median time between SBP measurements of 20 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 8, 53 days). Clinical and community recruitment paired with CHW connections to primary care may be a viable quality improvement strategy for improving blood pressure control in high-risk, socially vulnerable populations. However, additional research is needed to understand and improve participation and follow-up rates to establish program effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.