ArticleEndocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets2026
Identifying AIM2 Circulating Methylation Levels as a Novel Diagnostic Biomarker for Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Targeted DNA Methylation Sequencing.
Article in Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic pacemaker: A review of DNA methylation, histone lactylation, and non-coding RNAs in autoimmune skin diseases.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2026Review
- Rewiring immunity in rheumatoid arthritis: metabolic and epigenetic therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- The PANoptotic mosaic of rheumatoid arthritis: epitranscriptomic regulation, systemic relays, and precision death-mode editing.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Research advancements in DNA methylation pertaining to ankylosing spondylitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Rheumatoid Arthritis: Biomarkers and the Latest Breakthroughs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study investigated the association between
methodsMethylTarget™ sequencing targeted
resultsRA and RF/CCP-positive patients showed significantly higher methylation at cg11003133_79/91 compared to HC and AS (FDR < 0.05), but lower levels compared to DM. Methylation at cg11003133_139 was elevated in RA compared to AS/SS (FDR = 0.04/0.03). Anti- TNF-α non-responders had higher cg11003133_79/91 methylation levels compared to HC/AS non-responders (FDR < 0.05). RF-negative RA patients had higher cg11003133_91 methylation than AS patients who failed anti-TNF-α treatment (FDR < 0.05). Haplotype CCCC correlated positively with CRP (r = 0.14, P = 0.006); TTTT was significantly negatively correlated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP, and the presence of diabetes (r = -0.18, -0.15, and -0.14; P < 0.001, 0.003, and 0.008, respectively). XGBoost and RF models achieved AUCs of 0.9911 and 0.9975 for RA versus non-RA, and 1 for RF/CCP double-negative versus double-positive RA. DISCUSSION:
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.