Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40685691›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2025

Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Diabetes and Previous Stroke: A Post-Hoc Analysis of ACCORD-BP Trial.

Zhixian Wang, Jue Wang, Liu He, Chao Jiang, Yufeng Wang, Ting Shen, Meiqi Zhao, Enze Li, Ning Zhou, Caihua Sang and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT00000620. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00000620 phase3completed

Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)

Ran1999Enrolled10,251Registered outcomes6Posted comparisons6ConditionsAtherosclerosis, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Diabetes MellitusArmsAnti-hyperglycemic Agents, Anti-hypertensive Agents, Blinded fenofibrate or placebo plus simvastatin
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zhixian WangDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0008-1980-9615
Jue WangDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9227-6589
Liu HeDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Chao JiangDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1138-7960
Yufeng WangDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Ting ShenDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Meiqi ZhaoDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Enze LiDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Ning ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Caihua SangDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Xin DuDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Jianzeng DongDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Changsheng MaDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5387-5957

Funding

Beijing Municipal Education Commission KM202210025012Chinese Society of Cardiology's Foundation HFCSC2019A02National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC3601303National Natural Science Foundation of China 82100326National Natural Science Foundation of China 82270316National Natural Science Foundation of China D171100006817001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control reduces cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients, but its effects in those with diabetes and prior stroke need further evidence. Among 4733 patients with elevated SBP enrolled in the ACCORD-BP (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes-Blood Pressure) trial, this post-hoc analysis focused on 307 patients with type 2 diabetes and prior stroke to evaluate intensive versus standard SBP control. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed with a 3-year conditional landmark. Multivariable Cox regression models and overlap weighting models were constructed in sensitivity analysis. In landmark analysis at the 3-year time point, intensive SBP control was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% CI, 0.32-0.95) using the IPTW Cox model. The associations remained consistent across multivariable Cox regression model (HR 0.53, 95% CI, 0.31-0.90) and overlap weighting model (HR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.32-0.94). Patients in the intensive SBP control group showed a trend toward lower recurrent stroke risk, though it was not statistically significant (HR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.30-1.37). Similar trends were observed in subgroup analyses. In conclusion, targeting an SBP below 120 mmHg in patients with diabetes and prior stroke is associated with a lower risk of major cardiovascular events without increasing the risk of recurrent stroke. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00000620.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HypertensionStrokeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agentsblood pressurecardiovascular outcomediabetes mellitushypertensionstroke

Identifiers

PMID40685691
PMCPMC12277531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.