Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2025
Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Diabetes and Previous Stroke: A Post-Hoc Analysis of ACCORD-BP Trial.
Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT00000620. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control reduces cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients, but its effects in those with diabetes and prior stroke need further evidence. Among 4733 patients with elevated SBP enrolled in the ACCORD-BP (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes-Blood Pressure) trial, this post-hoc analysis focused on 307 patients with type 2 diabetes and prior stroke to evaluate intensive versus standard SBP control. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed with a 3-year conditional landmark. Multivariable Cox regression models and overlap weighting models were constructed in sensitivity analysis. In landmark analysis at the 3-year time point, intensive SBP control was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% CI, 0.32-0.95) using the IPTW Cox model. The associations remained consistent across multivariable Cox regression model (HR 0.53, 95% CI, 0.31-0.90) and overlap weighting model (HR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.32-0.94). Patients in the intensive SBP control group showed a trend toward lower recurrent stroke risk, though it was not statistically significant (HR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.30-1.37). Similar trends were observed in subgroup analyses. In conclusion, targeting an SBP below 120 mmHg in patients with diabetes and prior stroke is associated with a lower risk of major cardiovascular events without increasing the risk of recurrent stroke. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00000620.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.