Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40685555›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2025

Well-Being, Inflammation, and Physical Activity in Acute and Chronic Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of 22,864 UK Biobank Participants.

Romina Gollan, Patrick J Owen, Jamie L Tait, Luana C Main

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Romina GollanInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8781-9327
Patrick J OwenEastern Health Emergency Medicine Program, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3924-9375
Jamie L TaitInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5792-9430
Luana C MainInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9576-9466

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBack pain is influenced by biological, psychological, and social factors, yet is often investigated separately.

methodsCross-sectional analysis of the UK Biobank comparing well-being (Patient Health Questionnaire-4; 4-16 points; higher scores indicate greater levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms), number of stressful life events, C-reactive protein (CRP), and physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) among pain-free, acute, and chronic back pain individuals. The sample included 22,864 individuals: 5716 with acute back pain, 5716 with chronic back pain, and 11,432 pain-free controls. Group comparisons were performed using network analysis and analysis of covariance, adjusted for socioeconomic deprivation, body mass index, smoking, and alcohol consumption.

resultsWell-being was poorer in acute (mean difference [95% CI]: 0.20 [0.14, 0.25] points; p < 0.001) and chronic back pain (0.39 [0.34, 0.45] points; p < 0.001) compared to controls. More stressful life events were measured in acute (0.03 [0.01, 0.05] points; p = 0.041) and chronic back pain (0.03 [0.01, 0.05] points; p = 0.028) compared to controls. However, this finding was not robust to sensitivity analyses. Elevated CRP was found in acute (2.28 [0.57, 3.99]%; p = 0.024; ES = very small), but not in chronic back pain, compared to controls. No significant group differences were observed for physical activity. Network structures did not differ between groups.

conclusionsDifferences in well-being and CRP among pain-free, acute, and chronic back pain individuals were identified, suggesting that variables may be affected by back pain temporality. Further prospective research incorporating additional variables is needed to explore the drivers of back pain. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Individuals with acute back pain showed 2% higher CRP than controls, though values remained within the normal range (< 5 mg/L) across groups and below clinical relevance, suggesting limited utility of CRP in distinguishing acute from chronic back pain. Poorer well-being in both acute and chronic back pain underscores the need to explore underlying causal pathways. Moreover, similar network structures among groups indicate no neuroimmune involvement in back pain onset or chronification based on the variables examined.

Indexed as

Acute PainBack PainChronic PainExerciseInflammationAdultAgedC-Reactive ProteinCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesUK BiobankC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID40685555
PMCPMC12277551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.