Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40685550›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2025

Impact of rural-urban residence and deprivation on care pathways for depression disorders among adults in the UK.

Maxime Inghels, David Nelson, Ros Kane, Mark Gussy, Carl Deaney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of depression on quality of life in PKU children.European journal of pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Impact of rural-urban residence and deprivation on care pathways for depression disorders among adults in the UK.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maxime InghelsLincoln Institute for Rural and Coastal Health, College of Health and Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9340-2054
David NelsonLincoln Institute for Rural and Coastal Health, College of Health and Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2173-683X
Ros KaneSchool of Health and Care Sciences, College of Health and Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6926-2530
Mark GussyLincoln Institute for Rural and Coastal Health, College of Health and Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5010-6407
Carl DeaneyMarsh Medical Practice, Louth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2709-7960

Funding

Sir Halley Stewart Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate how rurality shapes individual care pathways and health outcomes for depression and to investigate the sociodemographic and economic relationships with urban-rural variations.

methodsA retrospective cohort study using routinely collected data from adult patients diagnosed for depression and registered at a general practice in Lincolnshire in the UK. Access and time to access from the onset of depression symptoms to the following care pathway states were described (ie, access to a depression screening tool, confirmed diagnosis, access to treatment and outcomes). Multistate survival analyses were conducted to investigate the effect of the patient's living environment (rural/urban, index of multiple deprivation) on progression through their care pathway for depression.

findingsOverall, 1,111 patients with depression were included. While access to depression services were lower for patients living in rural areas, they were more likely to experience positive depression outcomes, and more quickly, compared to their urban counterparts. Controlled depression and relapse rates were, respectively, 29% lower and 31% higher among urban residents. The level of deprivation was found to have a limited effect on care access, as well as on depression outcomes.

conclusionWhile accessing care services remains a challenge in rural areas, our study highlights the potential benefits of the rural context in improving depression outcomes and lowering relapse risk. Area-based deprivation had minimal impact on both care access and depression outcomes. Future mental health programs must tailor their strategies to the unique challenges of urban and rural environments to facilitate more effective interventions.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysDepressive DisorderRural PopulationUrban PopulationAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited Kingdomaccess to carecare pathwaydepressiondeprivationenvironmental factorsmental healthrural health

Identifiers

PMID40685550
PMCPMC12277484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.