Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40685516›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2025

Temporal niche differentiation often leads to priority effects rather than coexistence: Lessons from a marine midge.

Runa K Ekrem, Charlotte de Vries, Tobias S Kaiser, Hanna Kokko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Runa K EkremDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Charlotte de VriesDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8955-0479
Tobias S KaiserMax Planck Research Group Biological Clocks, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.
Hanna KokkoDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5772-4881

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt-StiftungNWO (Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek) VI.Veni.222.400Swiss National Science Foundation 31003A_163374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While niche differences aid coexistence, the role of temporal niches is complex. A recent study (Stump & Vasseur, 2023) casts doubt on the idea that species coexist easily if they partition abiotic niches that vary in time. The storage effect, which aids coexistence, requires that species differ in what is a 'good year', and that the benefits that the currently common species can draw from its own good year become limited due to intraspecific competition. The recent re-evaluation of temporal niches considered Allee effects only fleetingly. We complement their work by providing a case study of the marine midge Clunio marinus, where coexistence appears to occur in nature, is associated with a strong difference in timing traits, and also features Allee effects because rare timing phenotypes emerge with limited mating opportunities. The larvae develop in the sea, and adults emerge and mate during the lowest low tides. These tides coincide with either the full or the new moon, and genetically determined strains use either one of them, or both, for emergence. A 'good year' in this system translates into a particular low tide. Allee effects create strain-specific good tides if the risk of hybridization is greater for the currently rare strain, which mates more often with another strain, than the currently common strain. We are able to investigate this effect by varying the effects of hybridization in our model of Clunio biology. Temporal niches, mate-finding Allee effects, hybridization possibilities and a potential growth-survival tradeoff do not easily combine to yield stable coexistence. Most factors instead promote positive frequency dependence, leading to priority effects. Ontogenetic niche shifts among larvae deviate from this result: if suitably timed, they are able to concentrate competition in a coexistence-promoting manner. Our study thus complements and strengthens Stump and Vasseur's conclusion that a finding of temporal niche differentiation should not be straightforwardly assumed to be an explanation for the coexistence of two or more morphs or species. We encourage linking temporal niche studies with those of priority effects, as well as the study of other coexistence mechanisms that may operate within systems that feature temporal niches.

Indexed as

EcosystemAnimalsLarvacoexistencecompetitive exclusionmate‐finding Allee effectpolymorphismpriority effecttemporal niche

Identifiers

PMID40685516
PMCPMC12484382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.