SynthesisAnnals of medicine2025
Efficacy and safety of different acupuncture therapies in treating sleep apnea syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate and rank the efficacy and safety of different acupuncture (AP) therapies in treating sleep apnea syndrome (SAS).
methodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Wanfang Data, CNKI, CBM, and VIP for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying AP for SAS until April 25, 2024. Effectiveness required a >25% decrease in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and a >1/3 reduction in symptom scores after treatment. Secondary outcomes included AHI, lowest oxygen saturation (LSaO₂), longest apnea time (LAT), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score, and adverse events (AEs). We performed standard pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analyses (NMA) using Stata15.1 and RStudio4.2.3, assessed evidence quality (GRADE), and ranked treatments using SUCRA values.
resultsNetwork meta-analysis of 43 randomized trials (3402 SAS patients) revealed distinct efficacy profiles: Electroacupuncture (EA) was the best intervention for reducing apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (SUCRA=86.0%), while acupoint catgut embedding (ACE) ranked highest for both shortening longest apnea time (LAT) (SUCRA=98.7%) and improving lowest oxygen saturation (LSaO₂) (SUCRA = 89.7%). For reducing daytime sleepiness (ESS), manual acupuncture combined with Chinese herbal decoction (MA+OCHD) was most effective (SUCRA = 87.6%). In terms of overall clinical effectiveness rate, manual acupuncture plus Western medicine (MA+WM) performed best (SUCRA = 79.8%). Safety analysis showed Chinese herbal decoction (OCHD) alone was associated with the fewest adverse events (SUCRA = 93.4%).
conclusionAP therapies are effective and safe for SAS. EA or ACE best improves breathing parameters, MA+OCHD best reduces sleepiness, and MA+WM yields the highest overall effectiveness. These findings guide SAS treatment selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.