ArticleScientific reports2025
Accurate deep-learning model to differentiate dementia severity and diagnosis using a portable electroencephalography device.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge-Guided Deep Learning with Clinical EEG Biomarkers for Automated Dementia Detection and Staging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reduction of appearance artifacts in wearable on-skin electronics.Science advances · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based differential diagnosis of major depression and bipolar disorder using microglia-cellular sensors and patient-derived small extracellular vesicles.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Preoperative frontal EEG power spectral features associated with psychomotor subtypes of postoperative delirium in cardiovascular surgery: a prospective study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A deep-SVM hybrid framework with enhanced EEG feature engineering and SHAP-based explainability for Alzheimer's classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Interpretable Feature-Transformer Framework for Cross-Subject MCI Detection Using Nonlinear Dynamical and Graph-Theoretic EEG Features.Research square · 2026Article
- Wearable EEG devices in the detection of mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Electroencephalography for early Alzheimer's disease diagnosis: from advanced feature engineering to interpretable ai and clinical translation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia pose significant health challenges in aging societies, emphasizing the need for accessible, cost-effective, and noninvasive diagnostic tools. Electroencephalography (EEG) is a promising biomarker, but traditional systems are limited by size, cost, and the need for skilled technicians. This study proposes a deep-learning-based approach using data from a portable EEG device to distinguish healthy volunteers (HVs) from patients with dementia-related conditions. We analyzed EEG data from 233 participants, including 119 HVs and 114 patients, and transformed the signals into frequency-domain features using a short-time Fourier transform. A customized transformer-based model was trained and evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation and a holdout dataset. In the cross-validation, the model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.872 and a balanced accuracy (bACC) of 80.8% in distinguishing HVs from patients. Subgroup analyses were conducted for HVs versus patients stratified by dementia severity and by clinical diagnosis, yielding AUCs ranging from 0.812 to 0.898 and bACCs from 74.9 to 86.4%. Comparable results were obtained in the holdout dataset. These findings suggest that portable EEG data combined with deep learning may serve as a practical tool for the early detection and classification of dementia-related conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.