Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40685486›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Accurate deep-learning model to differentiate dementia severity and diagnosis using a portable electroencephalography device.

Masahiro Hata, Takufumi Yanagisawa, Yuki Miyazaki, Hisaki Omori, Atsuya Hirashima, Yuta Nakagawa, Mitsuhiro Eto, Kenji Yoshiyama, Hideki Kanemoto, Byambadorj Nyamradnaa and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Masahiro HataDepartment of Psychiatry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. mhata@psy.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Takufumi YanagisawaInstitute for Advanced Co-creation Studies, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Yuki MiyazakiDepartment of Psychiatry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hisaki OmoriDepartment of Psychiatry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Atsuya HirashimaDepartment of Psychiatry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yuta NakagawaDepartment of Psychiatry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Mitsuhiro EtoDepartment of Psychiatry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kenji YoshiyamaDepartment of Psychiatry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hideki KanemotoDepartment of Psychiatry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Byambadorj NyamradnaaPGV Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Shusuke YoshimotoPGV Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Kotaro EzurePGV Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Shun TakahashiDepartment of Psychiatry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Manabu IkedaDepartment of Psychiatry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia pose significant health challenges in aging societies, emphasizing the need for accessible, cost-effective, and noninvasive diagnostic tools. Electroencephalography (EEG) is a promising biomarker, but traditional systems are limited by size, cost, and the need for skilled technicians. This study proposes a deep-learning-based approach using data from a portable EEG device to distinguish healthy volunteers (HVs) from patients with dementia-related conditions. We analyzed EEG data from 233 participants, including 119 HVs and 114 patients, and transformed the signals into frequency-domain features using a short-time Fourier transform. A customized transformer-based model was trained and evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation and a holdout dataset. In the cross-validation, the model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.872 and a balanced accuracy (bACC) of 80.8% in distinguishing HVs from patients. Subgroup analyses were conducted for HVs versus patients stratified by dementia severity and by clinical diagnosis, yielding AUCs ranging from 0.812 to 0.898 and bACCs from 74.9 to 86.4%. Comparable results were obtained in the holdout dataset. These findings suggest that portable EEG data combined with deep learning may serve as a practical tool for the early detection and classification of dementia-related conditions.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDeep LearningDementiaElectroencephalographyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexAlzheimer’s diseaseDeep learningDementiaDLBEEGMild cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID40685486
PMCPMC12277436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.