ArticleEJNMMI reports2025
Ultra-low dose imaging in a standard axial field-of-view PET.
Article in EJNMMI reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Though ultra-low dose (ULD) imaging offers notable benefits, its widespread clinical adoption faces challenges. Long-axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT systems are expensive and scarce, while artificial intelligence (AI) shows great potential but remains largely limited to specific systems and is not yet widely used in clinical practice. However, integrating AI techniques and technological advancements into ULD imaging is helping bridge the gap between standard axial field-of-view (SAFOV) and LAFOV PET/CT systems. This paper offers an initial evaluation of ULD capabilities using one of the latest SAFOV PET/CT device. A patient injected with 16.4 MBq
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.