Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40685430›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep deterministic policy gradient-based automatic negotiation framework for shared decision-making.

Xin Chen, Ping Lu, Yong Liu, Fei-Ping Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xin ChenCollege of Artificial Intelligence, Xiamen Institute of Technology, Xiamen, 361021, China. chenxin@xit.edu.cn.
Ping LuSchool of Economic and Management, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, 361024, China.
Yong LiuCollege of Artificial Intelligence, Xiamen Institute of Technology, Xiamen, 361021, China.
Fei-Ping HongDepartment of Pediatrics, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China.

Funding

Xiamen Institute of Technology Institute-level scientific research fund project under Grant No.SJKY202305Xiamen Institute of Technology Young and Middle-aged Scientific Research Fund Project under Grant No.KYT2023005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shared Decision-Making (SDM), a patient-centered approach to medical care, improves treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction. However, traditional SDM struggles in handling complex medical scenarios, dynamic patient preferences, and multi-issue negotiations, particularly under incomplete information. The key challenge lies in capturing the fuzzy preferences of doctors and patients while ensuring efficient and fair multi-issue negotiations. This study introduces AutoSDM-DDPG, an automated SDM framework based on the Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) algorithm. Using an Actor-Critic network, the framework dynamically optimizes negotiation strategies to address multidimensional demands and resolve preference inconsistencies in treatment planning. Fuzzy membership functions are applied to model the uncertainty in patient preferences, enhancing representation and improving multi-issue negotiation outcomes. Experimental results show that AutoSDM-DDPG outperforms other models in key indicators, including social welfare, satisfaction disparity, and decision quality. It achieves faster and more equitable negotiations while balancing the needs of both doctors and patients. In scenarios involving multi-issue negotiations and complex preferences, AutoSDM-DDPG demonstrates exceptional adaptability, achieving efficient and fair decision-making.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedNegotiatingAlgorithmsFuzzy LogicHumansPatient PreferencePatient SatisfactionAgentDeep reinforcement learningDoctor-patient negotiationFuzzy constraintShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID40685430
PMCPMC12277425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.