ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on vehicle accident hazard scenario derivation based on improved AST.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traffic accident scenarios serve as one of the critical sources for autonomous driving simulation testing. However, scenarios directly generated from traffic accident data for testing autonomous driving safety suffer from insufficient hazard. This paper proposes a scenario derivation method that integrates a scene tree model constructed based on accident data with an improved adaptive stress test. By establishing the accident scene tree model, the search output yielded six categories of vehicle-to-vehicle conflict samples, eight categories of vehicle-pedestrian conflict samples, six categories of vehicle-non-motorized two/three-wheeler conflict samples, and six categories of vehicle-motorized two/three-wheeler conflict samples. Finally, the collision scenarios were derived using an adaptive stress testing algorithm, and the generated scenarios were evaluated in terms of rationality and hazard. The results show that the generation rates of vehicle-to-vehicle collision scenarios, vehicle-pedestrian collision scenarios, and vehicle-two-wheeler scenarios are 11.97%, 12.28%, and 13.38%, respectively. The method proposed in this paper enhances the hazard level of generated scenarios, which exceeds that of real collision scenarios. The research findings can provide references for constructing and deriving hazardous scenarios in current autonomous driving.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.