ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimization and benefit evaluation model of a cloud computing-based platform for power enterprises.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Data-driven network diagnostics for optimizing POCUS management: an actionable hospital analytical approach.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the challenges associated with the digital transformation of the power industry, this research develops an optimization and benefit evaluation model for cloud computing platforms tailored to power enterprises. It responds to the current lack of systematic optimization mechanisms and evaluation methods in existing cloud computing applications. The proposed model focuses on resource scheduling optimization, task load balancing, and improvements in computational efficiency. A multidimensional optimization framework is constructed, integrating key parameters such as path planning, condition coefficient computation, and the regulation of task and average loads. The model employs an improved lightweight genetic algorithm combined with an elastic resource allocation strategy to dynamically adapt to task changes across various operational scenarios. Experimental results indicate a 46% reduction in failure recovery time, a 78% improvement in high-load throughput capacity, and an average increase of nearly 60% in resource utilization. Compared with traditional on-premise architectures and static scheduling models, the proposed approach offers notable advantages in computational response time and fault tolerance. In addition, through containerized deployment and intelligent orchestration, it achieves a 43% reduction in monthly operating costs. A multi-level benefit evaluation system-spanning power generation, grid operations, and end-user services-is established, integrating historical data, expert weighting, and dynamic optimization algorithms to enable quantitative performance assessment and decision support. In contrast to existing studies that mainly address isolated functional modules such as equipment health monitoring or collaborative design, this research presents a novel paradigm characterized by architectural integration, methodological versatility, and industrial applicability. It thus addresses the empirical gap in multi-objective optimization for industrial-scale power systems. The theoretical contribution of this research lies in the establishment of a highly scalable and integrated framework for optimization and evaluation. Its practical significance is reflected in the notable improvements in operational efficiency and cost control in real-world applications. The proposed model provides a clear trajectory and quantitative foundation for promoting an efficient and intelligent cloud computing ecosystem in the power sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.