ArticleParasites & vectors2025
Combining blood meal analysis and parasite detection yields a more comprehensive understanding of insect host feeding patterns.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTraditionally, blood meal analysis has been the primary method used to assess feeding patterns of insects. In contrast, parasite detection is commonly applied to monitor parasite circulation and prevalence in vectors, but rarely to study host feeding patterns. Our study aimed to test whether broad-target screening for haemosporidian and trypanosome parasites could complement blood barcoding by revealing additional host associations. We hypothesised that combining both methods would provide a more comprehensive understanding of vector feeding behaviour than either method alone. In addition to evaluating the two methods, we also analysed the vector species composition and their abundance, providing important faunistic and prevalence data that contribute to the broader understanding of local vector-parasite dynamics.
methodsMosquitoes and biting midges were trapped over a 5-year period at three localities in Czechia. Blood-fed individuals underwent blood meal barcoding analysis. In parallel, parasite detection was conducted using nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and gut dissection techniques.
resultsA total of 10,152 mosquitoes were collected, with Culex pipiens (66%) and Aedes vexans (18%) being the predominant species. In addition, 1701 biting midges, primarily Culicoides pictipennis (61%) and C. festivipennis (12%), were captured. Among the collected samples, 281 mosquitoes (3%) and 52 biting midges (3%) were blood-fed. Parasites were detected in 468 mosquito pools (5%, 341 trypanosomes, 127 haemosporidians) and 21 midge pools (1%, 8 trypanosomes, 13 haemosporidians). Blood meal barcoding of engorged Aedes, Anopheles, Culiseta, and Mansonia samples revealed only mammalian hosts; however, parasite detection indicated previous feeding on birds. Culex displayed stronger ornithophily according to parasite detection, although blood meal analysis showed a more opportunistic behaviour, with the detection of avian, mammalian and even amphibian blood. Avian parasites were detected in five Culicoides species (Culicoides alazanicus, C. festivipennis, C. kibunensis, C. nubeculosus and C. pictipennis) while human blood was detected only in C. pictipennis. Overall, four Haemoproteus lineages and 15 Plasmodium lineages were identified, 11 of which were new records for Czechia and 4 were newly described.
conclusionsIntegrating blood meal analysis with parasite detection provides a more comprehensive understanding of insect feeding patterns and vector-host dynamics. Blood meal analysis remains the gold standard for identifying recent host interactions, offering direct and often species-level evidence of feeding events. In addition, parasite detection extends the window of detectability beyond the digestion of host blood and can reveal additional or otherwise-overlooked host associations. Together, these complementary approaches increase the likelihood of detecting interactions with a broader range of hosts, including humans, who might be missed by parasite screening alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.