Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40685282›Full record

Trial reportEuropean urology2026

Irreversible Electroporation for Prostate Tissue Ablation in Patients with Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: Results from the PRESERVE Trial.

Arvin K George, Ranko Miocinovic, Amit R Patel, Derek J Lomas, Andres F Correa, David Y T Chen, Ardeshir R Rastinehad, Michael J Schwartz, Abhinav Sidana, Kristian D Stensland and 13 more

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04972097 nacompletednot on this map

Pivotal Study of the NanoKnife System for the Ablation of Prostate Tissue in an Intermediate-Risk Patient Population

TypeinterventionalSponsorAngiodynamics, Inc.Ran2022 to 2024Enrolled121ConditionsProstate CancerArmsIrreversible Electroporation
NCT07788625 narecruitingnot on this map

Seeing the Unseen: ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET-CT-Directed Focal Therapy for MRI-Invisible Prostate Cancer (The FOCUS-PSMA Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2026 to 2029Enrolled60ConditionsProstate CancerArmsFocal Therapy for Prostate Cancer
NCT07792590 recruitingnot on this map

Prospective Database / Registry of Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2025 to 2031Enrolled200ConditionsProstate CancerArmsFocal Therapy for Prostate Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Results from the PRESERVE trial: an editorial commentary.Translational andrology and urology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Roundup.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Arvin K GeorgeVA Ann Arbor Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: ageorg29@jh.edu.
Ranko MiocinovicDuly Health and Care, Downers Grove, IL, USA.
Amit R PatelDuly Health and Care, Downers Grove, IL, USA.
Derek J LomasMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Andres F CorreaFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David Y T ChenFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ardeshir R RastinehadNorthwell Health System, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Michael J SchwartzNorthwell Health System, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Abhinav SidanaCollege of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Section of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kristian D StenslandVA Ann Arbor Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Brian T HelfandNorthshore University HealthSystem, Northshore University HealthSystem Research Institute, Evanston, IL, USA.
Jeffrey C GahanUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Xiaosong MengUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Alice YuMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Wayne G BrisbaneUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Srinivas VourgantiRush University Medical Center, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Al Baha BarqawiUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Edward M UchioUniversity of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
James S WysockNYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Thomas J PolascikDuke University, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Timothy D McClureCornell University, Weill Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Jonathan FainbergMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jonathan A ColemanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe PRESERVE study (NCT04972097) assessed the safety and effectiveness of irreversible electroporation (IRE) with the NanoKnife System to ablate prostate tissue in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

methodsThis prospective, nonrandomized, single-arm pivotal trial included patients in the USA who met the key inclusion criteria: age >50 yr with organ-confined, grade group 2 or 3 PCa, clinical stage ≤T2c, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤15 ng/ml, or PSA density <0.15 ng/ml KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 121 patients treated with IRE, the negative in-field biopsy rate at 12 mo was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62%, 79%). The secondary endpoint of negative in-field biopsy rate defined by the Delphi consensus criterion was 84% (95% CI: 76%, 90%). The time to median PSA nadir was 3.5 mo, and the median percent reduction in PSA at 6 mo was 68.2%. Urinary function outcomes had a mean change from baseline to 12 mo of 3 in the University of California Los Angeles Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite urinary domain total score and a mean change of -2 in the International Prostate Symptom Score total symptom score. At 12 mo, 84% of patients with good baseline sexual function maintained erections sufficient for penetration. Fourteen (12%) patients experienced Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3 and three experienced procedure-related grade 3 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: IRE with the NanoKnife System is safe and effective for prostate tissue ablation.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesElectroporationProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProstateProstate-Specific AntigenTreatment OutcomeProstate-Specific AntigenAblationClinical trialFocal therapyIrreversible electroporationProstate cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.