Trial reportEuropean urology2026
Irreversible Electroporation for Prostate Tissue Ablation in Patients with Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: Results from the PRESERVE Trial.
Trial report in European urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pivotal Study of the NanoKnife System for the Ablation of Prostate Tissue in an Intermediate-Risk Patient Population
Seeing the Unseen: ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET-CT-Directed Focal Therapy for MRI-Invisible Prostate Cancer (The FOCUS-PSMA Study)
Prospective Database / Registry of Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted microwave ablation of localised prostate cancer (VIOLETTE trial): a prospective multicentre study.BJU international · 2026Trial
- Water Vapor Therapy for the Management of Prostate Cancer: The VAPOR 2 Study Initial Results of Ablative Efficacy and Toxicity.The Journal of urology · 2026Article
- Cancer-specific mortality in high-risk or very high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with cryotherapy vs. external beam radiation therapy.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Response to: 'Revisiting patient selection and treatment planning in the VIOLETTE trial of targeted microwave ablation.BJU international · 2026Article
- Oncological and functional outcomes of focal irreversible electroporation for localised prostate cancer: a single institution series of 171 cases.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- Image-fusion-guided focal irreversible electroporation for prostate cancer: Step-by-step technique.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Results from the PRESERVE trial: an editorial commentary.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: State of the Art, Physical Principles, Potentials, and Challenges.Cancers · 2026Review
- Focal irreversible electroporation for the treatment of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Review
- Roundup.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThe PRESERVE study (NCT04972097) assessed the safety and effectiveness of irreversible electroporation (IRE) with the NanoKnife System to ablate prostate tissue in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa).
methodsThis prospective, nonrandomized, single-arm pivotal trial included patients in the USA who met the key inclusion criteria: age >50 yr with organ-confined, grade group 2 or 3 PCa, clinical stage ≤T2c, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤15 ng/ml, or PSA density <0.15 ng/ml KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 121 patients treated with IRE, the negative in-field biopsy rate at 12 mo was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62%, 79%). The secondary endpoint of negative in-field biopsy rate defined by the Delphi consensus criterion was 84% (95% CI: 76%, 90%). The time to median PSA nadir was 3.5 mo, and the median percent reduction in PSA at 6 mo was 68.2%. Urinary function outcomes had a mean change from baseline to 12 mo of 3 in the University of California Los Angeles Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite urinary domain total score and a mean change of -2 in the International Prostate Symptom Score total symptom score. At 12 mo, 84% of patients with good baseline sexual function maintained erections sufficient for penetration. Fourteen (12%) patients experienced Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3 and three experienced procedure-related grade 3 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: IRE with the NanoKnife System is safe and effective for prostate tissue ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40685282What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.