Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40685240›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Australasian Resuscitation In Sepsis Evaluation: FLUid or vasopressors In emergency Department Sepsis (ARISE FLUIDS) trial: study protocol.

Belinda D Howe, Stephen P J Macdonald, Glenn Arendts, Rinaldo Bellomo, Jonathon Burcham, Anthony Delaney, Diana Egerton-Warburton, Daniel Fatovich, John F Fraser, Alisa Higgins and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04569942 (Australasian Resuscitation In Sepsis Evaluation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04569942 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

Australasian Resuscitation In Sepsis Evaluation: FLUid or Vasopressors In Emergency Department Sepsis

TypeinterventionalSponsorAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research CentreRan2021 to 2026Enrolled1,000ConditionsShock, SepticArmsVasopressor, Fluids
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Belinda D HoweANZIC Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia belinda.howe@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0505-0383
Stephen P J MacdonaldCentre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9921-4620
Glenn ArendtsMedical School, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7830-7756
Rinaldo BellomoDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jonathon BurchamEmergency Department, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Anthony DelaneyThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Diana Egerton-WarburtonEmergency Department, Monash Medical Centre Clayton, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Daniel FatovichCentre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9414-6905
John F FraserCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Alisa HigginsANZIC Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Peter JonesSurgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1560-1186
Gerben KeijzersSchool of Medicine, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1100-4552
Elissa MilfordIntensive Care Unit, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Andrew Alexander UdyANZIC-RC, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6284-2022
Patricia WilliamsANZIC Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Paul YoungWellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3428-3083
Sandra L PeakeANZIC Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInternational consensus guidelines support the initial administration of 30 mL/kg of intravenous fluids for haemodynamic resuscitation of newly diagnosed septic shock. Practice variation exists between the volume of fluids administered and timing of vasopressor commencement. The optimal approach in patients with septic shock is uncertain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Australasian Resuscitation In Sepsis Evaluation: FLUid or vasopressors In emergency Department Sepsis is a 1000-participant multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel group clinical trial conducted in patients with septic shock presenting to the emergency department in participating sites in Australia, New Zealand and Ireland. Participants are randomised (1:1) to either restricted fluids and early vasopressors or a larger initial intravenous fluid volume and later vasopressors. The primary outcome is days alive and out of hospital at day 90 postrandomisation. Secondary outcomes are all-cause mortality at day 90, time from randomisation until death (to day 90), days alive and at home at day 90 and ventilator-free, vasopressor-free and renal replacement-free days to day 28 postrandomisation and death or disability at 6-month and 12-month postrandomisation. Health-related quality of life will be assessed at day 180 and 12 months following randomisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC2020/ETH02874) on 21 January 2021. Patients will be enrolled under a waiver of prior consent. The patient or next-of-kin (or equivalent according to local jurisdiction) is approached at the first available opportunity and given a trial information sheet. According to local approvals, the patient or next-of-kin chooses to either continue in the trial or opt-out/decline continued participation. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at academic conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04569942.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyResuscitationSepsisShock, SepticVasoconstrictor AgentsAustraliaEmergency Service, HospitalHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNew ZealandQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVasoconstrictor AgentsFluid TherapyHemodynamicsSepsisShock, SepticVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID40685240
PMCPMC12278162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.