ArticleBMJ open2025
Signs and symptoms of vulval lichen sclerosus in children and adolescents: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPaediatric vulval lichen sclerosus (VLS) is a chronic disease with distressing symptoms and severe consequences when left untreated. Majority of existing data on pathophysiology and treatment is based on studies conducted among adult patients. Whereas the course of VLS, its symptomatology and prognosis are distinct to some extent in paediatric and adolescent patients as compared with adults. The purpose of this scoping review is to systematically examine what symptoms of VLS are typical of paediatric and adolescent patients, how often specific signs and symptoms are reported in the literature, if there are differences between paediatric and adolescent patients and what could be the implication of such differences. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will adopt the methodology for Joanna Briggs Institute scoping reviews and will consider studies that include female patients aged 1-18, with VLS symptoms and signs with no exclusion based on ethnicity, comorbidity or previous history of treatment. Studies on any aspect of paediatric VLS, including pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment, which included patients and reported patients' symptoms and signs, will be considered eligible. There will be no geographical or cultural limitation applied in relation to this scoping review. The search will include Embase, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Health Source, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science Principal Collection. A critical synthesis and results will be presented in the final review as tables and accompanying narrative summary. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this review. To date, no systematic approaches were undertaken to classify symptoms of the VLS that would aid in formulating disease severity criteria adequate for the paediatric population. We believe that the results of this review will facilitate the development of disease severity scales that could aid in intraindividual and interindividual comparability, both in real-life settings and clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FB9EG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.