ArticleBMJ mental health2025
Agreeing a set of biopsychosocial variables for collection across the UK Eating Disorders Clinical Research Network: a consensus study using adapted nominal group technique.
Article in BMJ mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Clinical Correlates of Autistic Traits Across Eating Disorder Diagnoses: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Service Data.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Eating Disorder Focused Family Therapy with Autistic Children and Young People: A Narrative Review of Recent Developments.Current psychiatry reports · 2026Review
- Protein Acylation Modifications in Sleep Disorders: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2026Review
- Time to notice neurodiversity in eating disorder services: a three-year real-world analysis of autism, ADHD, and AuDHD.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Moving from recognising to responding to oral health needs in eating disorders: matters arising from Gidlund et al., 2025.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Regulating with food: a qualitative study of Neurodivergent experiences in adults with binge eating disorder.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Implementation Fidelity in Early Intervention for Eating Disorders-A Multisite Pilot Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Meta-Analytic Evidence Is In-Time to Get on and Improve Our Treatments.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Agreeing a set of biopsychosocial variables for collection across the UK Eating Disorders Clinical Research Network: a consensus study using adapted nominal group technique.BMJ mental health · 2025Article
- Personalised and precision mental health in eating disorders: why routine outcome measurement is key.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEating disorders are serious psychiatric disorders associated with high levels of co-occurring physical and mental health conditions and poor treatment outcomes. The collection of standardised, routinely collected data within clinical services holds promise to improve patient care.
objectiveTo agree on a set of biopsychosocial variables for routine data collection within eating disorder services in the UK.
methodsTwo online workshops were conducted using an adapted nominal group technique to agree on priorities for data collection in adult and child/adolescent eating disorder services. Workshop participants (n=43) consisted of people with lived experience, carers, clinicians and researchers. Two researchers independently conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of the workshop transcripts to identify qualitative priorities for data collection. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the results of online voting.
findingsThematic analysis identified four superordinate themes for data collection in eating disorder services: (1) a mutually valued and beneficial collaboration; (2) a holistic approach; (3) a balance between standardisation and individualisation; (4) doing no harm. Quantitative analysis of voting identified priorities across a range of domains, leading to a proposed biopsychosocial dataset.
conclusionsThis project agreed on a set of biopsychosocial variables for routine data collection in the UK Eating Disorders Clinical Research Network. Further research should evaluate the implementation success of these variables. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients, caregivers and clinicians support routine data collection in eating disorder services so long as the measures used are considered meaningful, not overly burdensome, non-stigmatising and collected in collaboration between patients and treatment providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.