Accuracy of Electronic Health Record-Based Definitions for Patients with Heart Failure.

backgroundDespite the widespread use of electronic health records, a standardized approach to identify heart failure patients is lacking. We sought to create and validate definitions for identifying patients with heart failure using electronic health record data.

methodsTo define heart failure, we developed 8 distinct definitions created from combinations of heart failure diagnosis based on ICD-10 codes listed in the clinical encounter, problem list or past medical history, and/or ejection fraction ≤ 40%. To validate our definitions, we used stratified sampling and physician chart review guided by the Universal Definition of Heart Failure as our gold standard and compared their performance using sensitivity and positive predictive value.

resultsWe identified 41,392 patients who met at least one of our eight definitions for heart failure, plus an additional 2,692 patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis of heart failure outside of a standard clinical setting and 696,896 patients with a cardiovascular diagnosis other than heart failure. Using these groups, we randomly sampled a total of 528 charts for physician chart review. Sensitivities of the eight definitions of heart failure ranged from 10.3% to 42.0%, and positive predictive values ranged from 80.7% to 98.6%.

conclusionsWe found that patients meeting EHR-based definitions of heart failure likely represented true clinical cases of disease. Nevertheless, the definitions captured less than half of the patients with heart failure, thus severely underestimating the prevalence of disease and underlining a need for more comprehensive methods to effectively use this data to understand the epidemiological burden of heart failure.