ArticleSLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D2025
Overcoming a false-positive mechanism in RapidFire MRM-based high throughput screening.
Article in SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
False-positives plague high-throughput screening in general and are costly as they consume resource and time to resolve. Methods that can rapidly identify such compounds at the initial screen are therefore of great value. Advances in mass spectrometry have led to the ability to screen inhibitors in drug discovery applications by direct detection of an enzyme reaction product. The technique is free from some of the artefacts that trouble classical assays such as fluorescence interference. Its direct nature negates the need for coupling enzymes and hence is simpler with fewer opportunities for artefacts. Despite its myriad advantages, we report here a mechanism for false-positive hits which has not been reported in the literature. Further we have developed a pipeline for detecting these false-positive hits and suggest a method to mitigate against them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.