ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2026
An artificial intelligence and machine learning model for personalized prediction of long-term mitral valve repair durability.
Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Unimodal to multimodal: a systematic review of predictive machine learning models for valvular heart diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning in mitral valve repair: promise, precision, and the challenge of clinical translation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Beyond the hazard ratio: machine learning and the future of personalized mitral valve repair counseling.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Predicting mitral valve repair durability using artificial intelligence: promises, pitfalls, and the path to clinical practice.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- The Expanding Therapeutic Armamentarium for Mitral Regurgitation: Surgical and Transcatheter Interventions.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- A Reproducible Post-Valve-Replacement EHR Cohort for Comparative AI Studies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe study objective was to compare Random Survival Forest, a machine learning method, with Cox proportional hazards models in predicting long-term mitral valve repair durability, focusing on clinical utility and personalized decision-making.
methodsWe analyzed 444 patients undergoing primary mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation (2008-2024). The primary outcome was mitral repair failure, defined as recurrent regurgitation/stenosis or reintervention. Random Survival Forest and penalized Cox proportional hazards models were compared for predictive accuracy and interpretability. A web-based application was created to demonstrate the Random Survival Forest model.
resultsThe failure end point, mitral repair failure, occurred in 13 individuals (3%) during the study period. Random Survival Forest showed superior discrimination (Concordance index: 0.874 vs 0.796) and identified both coaptation length and early mean mitral gradient as key predictors. Cox proportional hazards identified coaptation length alone, with each 1-mm increase reducing failure by approximately 40%. Random Survival Forest-predicted freedom from mitral repair failure at 5, 10, and 15 years was 94%, 74%, and 51% for coaptation length of 6 mm; 98%, 94%, and 91% for 9 mm; and 99%, 98%, and 96% for 12 mm, respectively. Mean gradients of 2 to 5 mm Hg were linked to 90% or greater durability at 5 to 10 years, whereas 8 mm Hg predicted worse outcomes (68% at 10 years, 64% at 15 years). Random Survival Forest further provided nuanced interpretation of temporal risk patterns and generated patient-specific survival estimates to improve repair durability forecasting.
conclusionsMachine learning outperforms traditional methods by modeling complex, nonlinear associations and identifying clinically actionable predictors. Integrating machine learning into surgical practice may support more personalized, data-driven mitral repair strategies and improve long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40684853What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.