Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40684853›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2026

An artificial intelligence and machine learning model for personalized prediction of long-term mitral valve repair durability.

Mohsyn Imran Malik, Rashmi Nedadur, Michael W A Chu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohsyn Imran MalikDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Science Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Rashmi NedadurDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Science Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Michael W A ChuDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Science Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: michael.chu@lhsc.on.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study objective was to compare Random Survival Forest, a machine learning method, with Cox proportional hazards models in predicting long-term mitral valve repair durability, focusing on clinical utility and personalized decision-making.

methodsWe analyzed 444 patients undergoing primary mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation (2008-2024). The primary outcome was mitral repair failure, defined as recurrent regurgitation/stenosis or reintervention. Random Survival Forest and penalized Cox proportional hazards models were compared for predictive accuracy and interpretability. A web-based application was created to demonstrate the Random Survival Forest model.

resultsThe failure end point, mitral repair failure, occurred in 13 individuals (3%) during the study period. Random Survival Forest showed superior discrimination (Concordance index: 0.874 vs 0.796) and identified both coaptation length and early mean mitral gradient as key predictors. Cox proportional hazards identified coaptation length alone, with each 1-mm increase reducing failure by approximately 40%. Random Survival Forest-predicted freedom from mitral repair failure at 5, 10, and 15 years was 94%, 74%, and 51% for coaptation length of 6 mm; 98%, 94%, and 91% for 9 mm; and 99%, 98%, and 96% for 12 mm, respectively. Mean gradients of 2 to 5 mm Hg were linked to 90% or greater durability at 5 to 10 years, whereas 8 mm Hg predicted worse outcomes (68% at 10 years, 64% at 15 years). Random Survival Forest further provided nuanced interpretation of temporal risk patterns and generated patient-specific survival estimates to improve repair durability forecasting.

conclusionsMachine learning outperforms traditional methods by modeling complex, nonlinear associations and identifying clinically actionable predictors. Integrating machine learning into surgical practice may support more personalized, data-driven mitral repair strategies and improve long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningMitral ValveMitral Valve InsufficiencyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCox proportional hazardexplainable artificial intelligencemachine learningmitral valve repairpersonalized medicinerandom forestRandom Survival Forestrisk predictionsurvival analysistime-to-event analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.