Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40684803›Full record

ReviewPlant & cell physiology2025

Photoinhibition and protection of photosystem I.

Kintake Sonoike

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant & cell physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects of Photosynthesis Inhibitors on HPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kintake SonoikeFaculty of Education and Integrated Arts and Sciences, Waseda University, 2-2 Wakamatsu-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8480, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5327-473X

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22H02651Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23H04961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 30 years ago, when we first reported the selective photoinhibition of photosystem I (PSI) in chilling-sensitive plants at chilling temperatures, the inhibition tended to be regarded as a specific phenomenon observed only under unusual conditions. We have since learned that PSI can be photoinhibited under many different conditions. The inhibition was observed in isolated thylakoid membranes under low light, or with some mutant plants under fluctuating light, or with plants illuminated by a series of saturating light pulses. Apparently, the sensitivity of PSI to photoinhibition is an intrinsic property of this photosystem. To understand the mechanism of PSI photoinhibition, which is now known to occur universally in nature, a comparison of different types of PSI photoinhibition should certainly be useful. In this review, similarities and differences in the mechanisms of photoinhibition between different types of PSI photoinhibition, as well as the protection mechanisms from the inhibition, are discussed.

Indexed as

LightPhotosystem I Protein ComplexPlantsThylakoidsPhotosystem I Protein Complexchilling sensitivityelectron transportfluctuating lightphotoinhibitionphotosystem Iredox regulation

Identifiers

PMID40684803
PMCPMC12661322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.