ReviewVaccine2025
Non-typhoidal Salmonella combination vaccines: clinical development plan and regulatory considerations.
Review in Vaccine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Estimating the economic burden of invasive non-typhoidalBMJ global health · 2025Pooled it
- Recent developments in typhoidal and non-typhoidal Salmonella vaccines.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Need, demand, and feasibility for a new iNTS vaccine: stakeholder insights from eight African countries.NPJ vaccines · 2026Article
- Country-level perspectives and priorities to guide the development of Invasive non-Typhoidal Salmonella (iNTS) vaccines: Insights from seven countries.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Confronting the known unknown: historical lessons and future strategies for Disease X.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Invasive non-typhoidal serovars of Salmonella enterica,S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis, (iNTS) are estimated to cause over 500,000 cases of disease leading to more than 79,000 deaths with a high case fatality ratio of 14.5 %. Most infections occur in infants and young children in LMICs in sub-Saharan Africa where host risk factors for iNTS disease such as malaria, malnutrition, HIV infection, and anemia are common. iNTS disease is observed from birth, with a peak incidence early in the second year of life, declining before the age of 3 years. The prevalence of multiple drug resistance of iNTS has increased markedly by decade, emphasizing the need for effective vaccines. A clinical development plan and regulatory pathway for licensure of iNTS vaccines has been shaped following the development of Preferred Product Characteristics and R&D Roadmap through a series of expert consultations. Several iNTS alone or combined with Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine platforms are in early clinical development. Encouraging safety and immunogenicity data have prompted developers and manufacturers to plan efficacy trials, aligned with regulatory expectations. It is critical to clearly communicate iNTS disease burden in endemic countries and to discuss complexities related to iNTS single component or combination vaccine clinical development with regulators. An essential component is the disease burden in infants less than 6 months of age, which will inform the optimal age of first vaccination (less than or from 6 months), compatibility across national expanded programme on immunization schedules, and whether a booster dose would be needed. Early regulatory guidance is essential to make informed regulatory decisions and to guide the clinical development plan and licensure pathway. Continued communication with public health stakeholders and end-user representatives will effectively contribute to better awareness and education about iNTS disease and protection afforded by vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.