ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
The predictive value of hyaluronic acid for the severity and prognosis of COVID-19: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A nomogram for predicting ARDS progression and need for invasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients using plasma hyaluronic acid and clinical scores.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to elucidate the relationship between HA levels and clinical outcomes, including disease severity and prognosis.
methodsA retrospective multicenter cohort analysis was conducted across three medical centers in China from September 2022 to February 2023. Patients with positive nucleic acid for the novel coronavirus were included in the study. The primary endpoint is 28-day mortality.The severity was assessed by the 'Diagnosis and Treatment Plan for Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (Trial Version 9)'. Analyses assessed HA correlation with severity (Kendall), predictive value for mortality (logistic regression, ROC, Delong test), and survival differences (KM analysis using a Youden index-derived HA cutoff).
resultsA total of 862 patients (median age 72; 58.47% male) were included in the study, of whom 108 died. Non-survivors were older, more men, lower BMI, and more complicatinos. The overall median HA level was 121.65 ng/ml, significantly higher in non-survivors(
conclusionHA may potentially function as a biomarker for COVID-19 and could provide a vital reference for the clinical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.