ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Gynecological surgery using the Kangduo robotic system.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Emerging robotic platforms in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Commentsmparing the KangDuo surgical Robot-01 and da Vinci Xi system for endometrial cancer surgery: a multi-center, randomized, parallel-controlled, noninferiority trial".International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRobotic surgery represents a notable advancement in the field of minimally invasive gynecological surgery. Although the Kangduo Robot® SR1000 (KD-SR-01) surgical system has shown improved stability and high efficiency, studies describing its use for gynecological surgery are limited. We aimed to review the safety and effectiveness of the KD-SR-01 system in gynecologic surgery and compare it with conventional laparoscopic operation. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe compared patient characteristics and short-term outcomes in cases of gynecological surgery conducted using the KD-SR-01 system and laparoscopic minimally invasive procedures between March 2024 and October 2024. The short-term clinical efficacies of both surgical modalities were compared by performing statistical analyses.
resultsThe KD-SR-01 system was used for total hysterectomy due to benign uterine tumors in 144 cases, ovarian cyst removal surgery due to benign ovarian tumors in 25 cases, unilateral adnexectomy due to benign ovarian tumors or borderline tumors in 25 cases, staging of early endometrial cancer in 24 cases, and radical cervical cancer resection for early cervical cancer in 24 cases. None of the patients showed serious complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3). In comparison with traditional laparoscopic surgery, Kangduo robotic surgery resulted in a lower duration of hospitalization, operation time, blood loss, and drainage volume, but the two surgical modalities showed no differences in the complication rate.
conclusionThe Kangduo robotic system was safe and feasible for gynecological surgery. Evidence from additional studies and more surgical experience are required to determine the long-term outcomes and indications for gynecological surgery using this robotic system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.