Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40684413›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025

Robotic-assisted primary ventral and incisional hernia repair: a comprehensive comparative analysis of rv-TAPP, r-Rives, and r-TARUP techniques.

Danilo Coco, Silvana Leanza

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Danilo CocoDepartment of General Surgery, Giglio Hospital Foundation, Cefalù, Italy. webcostruction@msn.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5839-1767
Silvana LeanzaDepartment of General Surgery, Giglio Hospital Foundation, Cefalù, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8672-7486

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery has transformed hernia repair by improving precision, minimizing postoperative complications, and accelerating recovery. This study evaluates three robotic techniques-robotic transabdominal preperitoneal (rTAPP), robotic Rives (rRives), and robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic (rTARUP)-for treating primary ventral and incisional hernias. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for studies comparing rTAPP, rRives, and rTARUP. Key outcomes included recurrence rates, surgical duration, and postoperative complications, with secondary outcomes assessing hospital stay and cost-effectiveness. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 and STATA 16, calculating pooled odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD). Heterogeneity was measured via I

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyIncisional HerniaRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansLength of StayOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeIncisional herniaMeta-analysisRobotic hernia repairrRivesrTAPPrTARUPVentral hernia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.