ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2025
Breast tumors with intermediate ER expression differ biologically from ER-low tumors and exhibit a more favorable prognosis.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival across estrogen receptor expression subgroups in HER2-negative breast cancer: a population-based cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEstrogen receptor (ER) expression in breast cancer exhibits a widely recognized bimodal distribution, with increasing focus on the biological and clinical characteristics of the low-expression group. However, tumors with intermediate ER expression have been relatively understudied. This study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological and prognostic features of ER-intermediate (ER-int) tumors by comparing them with ER-low tumors.
methodsTumors were classified into ER-low (1-10%), ER-int (11-70%), and ER-high (71-100%) groups based on immunohistochemistry. We retrospectively analyzed 261 breast cancer patients with ER-low or ER-int tumors who underwent curative surgery. Clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes were compared, and factors influencing distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models. For analysis of clinical outcomes, after excluding HER2-positive tumors, an additional cohort of 604 patients with ER-high and HER2-negative tumors was also compared.
resultsER-int tumors showed lower nuclear grade, higher progesterone receptor expression, and lower Ki67 labeling index compared with ER-low tumors. Pathological stage was independently associated with both DRFS and OS. In addition, ER status was also an independent factor for OS, with ER-int tumors showing significantly better OS than ER-low tumors (P = 0.014).
conclusionsOur findings, based on comparison with ER-low tumors, suggest that intermediate ER expression may represent a biologically and clinically heterogeneous subgroup within ER-positive breast cancers. Recognition of this heterogeneity could help refine classification and support more individualized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40684412What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.