Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40684398›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2025

Improvement in residual paravalvular leakage after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding valve: ACURATE neo2 versus ACURATE neo.

Yoichi Sugiyama, Hirokazu Miyashita, Sebastian Dahlbacka, Tommi Vähäsilta, Tiina Vainikka, Mikko Jalanko, Juho Viikilä, Mika Laine, Noriaki Moriyama

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yoichi SugiyamaDepartment of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Okamoto 1370-1, Kamakura City, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan.
Hirokazu MiyashitaDepartment of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Okamoto 1370-1, Kamakura City, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan. pastello41@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1562-9437
Sebastian DahlbackaDepartment of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Tommi VähäsiltaDepartment of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Tiina VainikkaDepartment of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Mikko JalankoDepartment of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Juho ViikiläDepartment of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Mika LaineDepartment of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Noriaki MoriyamaDepartment of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Okamoto 1370-1, Kamakura City, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paravalvular leakage (PVL) incidence immediately after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is reportedly lower with ACURATE neo2 than with ACURATE neo. However, the difference in the subsequent PVL improvement between these valves and the improvement mechanism remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the incidence of and changes in the PVL between these valves and investigate the factors associated with PVL improvement. We included 403 patients who underwent TAVR with ACURATE neo2 (n = 134) or ACURATE neo (n = 269). The study endpoint was PVL improvement, defined as a reduction in the PVL grade from mild or higher at discharge to none/trace at 3 months. The PVL incidence of mild grade or higher was significantly lower with ACURATE neo2 than with ACURATE neo at 3 months (15.7% vs. 25.7%; p = 0.0234) but did not differ significantly at discharge (33.3% vs. 27.5%; p = 0.2291). A significant decrease in the PVL was observed only with ACURATE neo2 (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ACURATE neo2 and calcium volume of the aortic leaflets were independent predictors of PVL improvement. The incidence of mild grade or higher PVL was lower with ACURATE neo2 than with ACURATE neo at 3 months due to the subsequent improvement. Patient selection focusing on leaflet calcification is important for preventing PVL because severe calcification impedes PVL improvement.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve ProsthesisPostoperative ComplicationsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesAortic stenosisParavalvular leakageSelf-expanding valveTranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID40684398
PMCPMC12431930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.