ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2025
Assessment of the variant prioritization strategy for genomic newborn screening in the Generation Study.
Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and penetrance of heritable retinoblastoma in two adult population cohorts: implications for genomic newborn screening.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Perspectives on genomic newborn screening studies: design, implementation, and outcomes.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Characterisation of the SMN1/2 locus using a highly specific variant caller on whole-genome sequence data from 500,000 individuals.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Next-generation newborn screening: feasibility of combined genetic and biochemical testing for 95 treatable inherited metabolic disorders.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Review
- Uncovering apparent incomplete penetrance of TSC1/TSC2 variants: Insights from multiple population cohorts and implications for newborn screening.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Embedding ethics into Genomics England's Generation Study.BMJ open · 2026Review
- Integrating next-generation sequencing with biochemical screening to optimize first-tier newborn screening systems.Human genomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeGenomic sequencing offers the opportunity to screen for hundreds of rare genetic conditions. To minimize potential negative impact on families and clinical services, it is crucial to reduce false-positive results while prioritizing clinical utility. We present an automated variant prioritization approach in the Generation Study, a research study investigating genomic sequencing in 100,000 newborns in England. Prioritized variants will subsequently undergo manual review by a registered clinical scientist and a specialist clinician before being reported back to parents.
methodsWe assessed specificity of our automated variant prioritization approach in 34,410 samples not enriched for rare diseases and sensitivity in 546 samples from patients with diagnostic variants in genes relevant to newborn screening. We used coverage and copy-number variants callability metrics to evaluate variant detection.
resultsWe estimated that 3% to 5% of samples will have prioritized variants that require manual review and that <1% of cases will have reportable variants requiring further confirmation of the condition. Sensitivity in genes included in the Generation Study was estimated to be approximately 80%. Gene-level specificity results led to changes in variant prioritization rules and conditions that are included.
conclusionGene-specific assessment of variant prioritization is crucial to establish analytical validity prior to inclusion in genomic newborn screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.