ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
Staging of Alzheimer's disease progression in Down syndrome using mixed clinical and plasma biomarker measures with machine learning.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The association between APOE 𝜀4 carrierships and the detection of amyloid positivity using an Alzheimer's disease proteomic blood test in asymptomatic Down syndrome.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Neuropathological measures of increased tau phosphorylation across the Down syndrome lifespan.Acta neuropathologica · 2026Article
- Staging of Alzheimer's disease progression in Down syndrome using mixed clinical and plasma biomarker measures with machine learning.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAdults with Down syndrome (DS) have a high risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although the sequence of plasma biomarker and cognitive changes in AD in DS is well studied, their related trajectories are not fully characterized. Data-driven methods can estimate disease progression from cross-sectional data.
methodsIn 57 adults with DS and no AD, we used the event-based model to sequence plasma biomarker and cognitive changes in preclinical AD. Generalized additive models assessed the relationship between age and plasma biomarkers.
resultsThe earliest changes occurred in the amyloid beta 42/40 ratio, followed by memory changes. Later alterations in neurofilament light and tau concentrations preceded executive and visuomotor function changes, with glial fibrillary acidic protein levels changing last. The highest rate of plasma biomarker changes occurred between ages 39 and 52.
conclusionChanges in DS follow a pattern similar to that of sporadic and familial AD. Event-based modeling offers individual-level staging, potentially optimizing diagnosis and clinical trial patient selection. HIGHLIGHTS: The pre-clinical stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) development in Down syndrome (DS) are not well defined, despite the extremely high prevalence of AD. Better understanding of early AD progression would aid in diagnostics and treatment. Data-driven methods, such as the event-based model, can aid in clarifying the sequence of cognitive and plasma biomarker changes in the early stages of AD while accounting for baseline variability. We find that plasma amyloid beta 42/40 ratio and memory changes precede changes in plasma biomarker levels of neurodegeneration, with changes in executive and visuomotor functions occurring later, before neuroinflammatory marker changes. Combining plasma biomarkers could be a useful measure of preclinical AD for trials, particularly in individuals between 39 and52 years of age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.