ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Comparison of posterior trans-intervertebral osteotomy and pedicle Subtraction osteotomy for the correction of thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity secondary to ankylosing spondylitis.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnkylosing spondylitis (AS) often leads to severe thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity, requiring surgical correction. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is the gold standard but carries risks of significant blood loss and neurological complications. Posterior trans-intervertebral osteotomy (PTIO) has emerged as a less invasive alternative, but its comparative efficacy and safety remain unclear. This study aimed to compare radiographic outcomes, surgical parameters, and complications between PTIO and PSO in AS-related kyphosis.
methodsA single-center retrospective cohort study included 45 AS patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis (19 PTIO, 26 PSO) who underwent posterior spinal correction. Radiographic parameters (global kyphosis GK, sagittal vertical axis SVA, etc.), surgical data (operative time, blood loss), health-related quality of life (SRS-22), and complications were analyzed. Statistical comparisons were performed using independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables and chi-square/Fisher's tests for categorical variables.
resultsBoth groups achieved significant kyphosis correction, with no differences in postoperative GK (PTIO: 51.4° ± 13.3° vs. PSO: 47.4° ± 13.0°, P > 0.05) or SVA (PTIO: 59.1 ± 50.3 mm vs. PSO: 49.0 ± 47.1 mm, P > 0.05). PTIO showed lower intraoperative blood loss (600.9 ± 264.6 mL vs. 1088.7 ± 287.9 mL, P = 0.009) and fewer neurological complications (5.3% vs. 15.4%, P = 0.003). Health-related quality of life improved similarly in both groups (P > 0.05).
conclusionPTIO provides comparable radiographic correction to PSO while reducing blood loss and neurological risks. It represents a viable, less invasive alternative for AS-related kyphosis, particularly when anterior column support is achievable. Further studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.