ArticleBMC medical ethics2025
Ethical dilemmas experienced by midwives in their professional practice in Northwestern Ethiopia: a phenomenological interview study.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEthical dilemmas in healthcare arise from conflicts among ethical beliefs, duties, principles, and theories. Midwives face ethical dilemmas in their clinical practice, where their decisions significantly affect the well-being of mothers and infants. However, there is a scarcity of data about midwives' experience of ethical dilemmas in Ethiopia. The aim of this study was to explore the ethical dilemmas faced by midwives in their professional practice in northwestern Ethiopia, 2024.
methodsA qualitative study with a phenomenological approach was conducted from December 2023 to January 2024 in three referral hospitals in northwest Ethiopia. A purposive sampling technique was used to select fourteen midwives with at least two years of clinical experience. In-depth, face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect data. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis method with the support of Atlas.ti version 23.
resultsFive major themes and ten sub-themes emerged from participants: Cultural and religious views, including religious beliefs versus abortion care and cultural constraints on women's autonomy; Confidentiality and communication, particularly dilemmas around truth-telling versus preventing harm and confidentiality versus preventing harm; Autonomy versus beneficence, including patient refusal of care and maternal-fetal conflicts; Unsafe work environments, such as personal safety versus professional duty and resource constraint versus highest quality care; and Professional role conflict, including limited decision-making power and restricted practice. Midwives addressed these dilemmas through consultation and negotiation strategies.
conclusionThis study showed that midwives faced various ethical dilemmas in their professional practice resulting from the interface of personal values, cultural influences, institutional limitations, and professional roles. These dilemmas significantly impacted their ability to provide respectful, autonomous, and equitable care. Promoting ethical competence, empowering midwives, and encouraging supportive institutional structures are essential for improving ethical decision-making and the quality of maternal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.