ArticleBMC genomics2025
Evolutionary origin of the frameshift sites in the ribosomal frameshifting genes of Euplotes.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- FScanR reveals widespread programmed ribosomal frameshifting consistent with neutral evolution in a ciliate model.European journal of protistology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProgrammed ribosome frameshifting is a translational recoding event in which ribosomes slip forward or backward along the mRNA. Although genes utilizing programmed ribosomal frameshifting for their expression have been found in most organisms, such genes are commonly considered rare. However, previous studies indicated that both +1 and +2 ribosomal frameshifting are frequently required for the expression of genes in the ciliates Euplotes. In this study, we explored the possible evolutionary origin of the frameshift sites by comparative transcriptome and genome analyses.
resultsWe sequenced the transcriptomes of different Euplotes octocarinatus strains and performed comparative analyses of the frameshift sites. Finally, a total of 147 non-conserved frameshift sites among different strains were identified. Multiple sequence alignment results showed that +1 frameshift sites could be generated by random single-nucleotide insertion and +2 frameshift sites could be generated by insertion of 'TA' or single-nucleotide deletion. In addition, frameshift sites tend to be less frequent in highly expressed genes. The distances between indel sites and frameshift sites were generally short. And the changed amino acids numbers of the indel sites located inside the protein domain were significantly less than that of the indel sites located outside the domain. Furthermore, we also found a putatively newly formed frameshift site which exists only in the macronucleus but not in the micronucleus of Euplotes woodruffi.
conclusionsWe provide an overview of the evolutionary origin of frameshift sites in Euplotes. Our results suggest that the widespread ribosomal frameshifting in Euplotes may be a result of long-term accumulation of indel mutation. And preservation of these indel mutations in the genome of Euplotes apparently need to meet some constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.