ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025
Multi-cohort analysis identifies a blood-based immune transcriptomic signature for early lung cancer detection.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrative transcriptomic profiling of tumor patients in surgical ICU: identifying prognostic immune signatures.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early diagnosis of lung cancer is critical for timely intervention and reducing mortality. The immune system and cancer are intricately linked, which provides a unique opportunity to monitor changes in the immune system as a biomarker of cancer development. We collected bulk blood transcriptome from 432 lung cancer cases, 8154 healthy controls, and 14,187 samples with other diseases from 241 datasets for discovery. We also obtained a prospectively enrolled cohort of 371 subjects (172 with lung cancer) and 454 subjects from the Framingham Heart Study (42 with lung cancer) for validation. Furthermore, we integrated single-cell RNA sequencing profiles of 1,022,063 cells from 260 blood, lymph node, or lung tissue samples from lung cancer patients and other samples across 15 datasets. We performed a multi-cohort blood transcriptome meta-analysis and identified 6 genes consistently differentially expressed between lung cancer and other samples. Using the 6-gene signature, we defined a lung cancer score that was primarily derived from myeloid cells and was consistently higher in tumor-associated macrophages and fibroblasts than their normal counterparts. In the prospectively enrolled cohort, the diagnostic classifier using the lung cancer score had an AUROC of 0.822 (95% CI: 0.78-0.864) for distinguishing patients with lung cancer from control or benign samples. The classifiers could also potentially reduce the need for additional testing in 37% of patients with benign lung conditions at 90% sensitivity. Importantly, the lung cancer score was also significantly associated with an elevated risk of future lung cancer diagnosis in the Framingham cohort study. Together, we identified a robust blood-based immune gene signature for early detection of lung cancer, which has potential for further clinical development to aid early cancer detection and diagnosis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.