ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
From Podium to PubMed: Successful Manuscript Publication of Oral Breast Surgery Abstract Presentations at National Meetings from 2017 to 2022.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ASO Author Reflections: Supporting Researchers from Podium to PubMed.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLess than half of scientific presentations result in manuscript publication. This study aims to assess manuscript publication rate for oral breast surgery abstracts at three national surgical conferences and examine factors associated with successful publication.
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of orally presented breast surgery abstracts from the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS), American College of Surgeons (ACS), and Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) annual meetings from 2017 to 2022. Univariate and multivariate logistic and linear regression models were used to examine factors predictive of publication, journal impact factor, and time from presentation to publication.
resultsA total of 441 oral presentations met inclusion. Most presenting first authors were trainees (residents or fellows) (56.8%) or attendings/faculty (26.7%). Overall manuscript publication rate was 60.5% (n=267) and was 81.1% for ASBrS, 43.0% for ACS, and 63.4% for SSO. On unadjusted models, compared to medical students, trainees (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.5) and attendings/faculty (OR 2.9, 95%CI 1.4-6.4) were more likely to publish (p<0.05). On multivariate analysis, abstracts presented at ACS (OR 0.2, 95%CI 0.11-0.36, p<0.001) and SSO (OR 0.4, 95%CI 0.25-0.79, p<0.001) had lower odds of publication than those presented at ASBrS. Median journal impact factor was 3.7 and median time to publication was 5 months (IQR 2-12.5).
conclusionFirst author role and meeting type were predictive of manuscript publication for breast surgery presentations at national meetings on unadjusted and multivariate models, respectively. Findings may inform abstract submissions and underscores the need to support medical students to publish their work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.