ArticleScientific reports2025
Urological management in people with traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury in Brazil.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the critical need for data to support public health policies in Brazil, there is a glaring lack of national epidemiological studies on neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). This study aimed to illuminate the factors associated with the urological management of NLUTD among individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) and non-traumatic spinal cord injury (NTSCI). Employing a quantitative, cross-sectional, and descriptive design, this study analyzed electronic medical records of NLUTD and SCI patients monitored within the SARAH network from 2007 to 2017. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected, including the ASIA Impairment Scale, and statistical analyses such as the Mann-Whitney and Pearson's Chi-square tests were conducted. The findings revealed that out of 903 patients, 67% had TSCI and 33% had NTSCI. Clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) was the primary bladder emptying method, utilized by 66.11% of the participants. The average emptying frequency was 4.71 times a day, and urinary incontinence was reported in 58.4% of cases. A significantly higher rate of positive urinary colonization was found among TSCI patients. The study highlighted significant differences in NLUTD management between TSCI and NTSCI patients, with NTSCI patients more frequently achieving voluntary urination and using maneuvers to stimulate urination. These distinctions underscore the need for more individualized approaches and deeper understanding of each type of spinal cord injury, aiming to enhance bladder rehabilitation programs in Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.