ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2025
Developing the Shame and Guilt Scale in Secondary Traumas.
Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current research aimed to develop a scale measuring feelings of shame and guilt in secondary traumas. In addition, the current research's another aimed to test the mediating role of negative emotion in the relationship between psychological resilience and feelings of shame and guilt in secondary traumas. The study was conducted in three stages, and all consist of people from different provinces of Türkiye. There were 118 participants from the general population in the pilot study, 310 participants in Study 1, and 414 participants in Study 2. The age range of the participants in all groups is 18-50. The data obtained from the entire research were analyzed in SPSS and AMOS analysis programs. The Shame and Guilt Scale in Secondary Traumas, Brief Psychological Resilience Scale, Toronto Empathy Scale, Trait Shame and Guilt Scale, and Positive and Negative Emotion Scales were used in the study. The Shame and Guilt Scale in Secondary Traumas consists of 2 sub-dimensions, "escape" and "facilities", and a total of 8 items. The Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient of the scale is .84 for the escape sub-dimension; it was calculated as .91 for the facilities sub-dimension and .86 for the overall scale. As a result, it can be said that the Shame and Guilt Scale in Secondary Traumas is a valid and reliable measurement tool. In line with the second aimed of this research, it was observed that negative emotions had a full mediator role in the relationship between the feelings of shame and guilt experienced in the general population in secondary traumas and psychological resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40683997What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.