ArticleScientific reports2025
Computer vision to predict cell seeding coverage in re-endothelialized mouse lungs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeted cell deposition for lung re-endothelialization.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transplantation of donor grafts recellularized with recipient-derived or non-immunogenic universal cells is a potential means of reducing the graft rejection and post-transplant complications in lung transplantation. Achieving a fully recellularized lung, however, remains a far-off goal and has several limitations, including inadequate cell coverage of the acellular scaffold. A key parameter for evaluating recellularization efficacy is the cell seeding coverage (CSC); the ratio of seeded cell area to the total area of the lung scaffold. To calculate the CSC from a histological image, the lung scaffold and the seeded cell areas must be quantified. In this work, the ability of semantic segmentation to accurately automate the pixel-wise analysis of histological images is investigated. Specifically, the U-Net and LinkNet models are applied to re-endothelialized mouse lung images, generating pixel-wise classifications of the lung scaffold and the seeded cell areas to calculate the CSC. Model performance when trained on complete images and on image patches is compared. The patch-based U-Net model outperformed the other models, predicting CSC with a root mean square error of 2.23 ± 0.36%, in addition to classifying lung scaffold pixels and seeded cell pixels with intersection over union scores of 77.8 ± 1.4% and 69.5 ± 1.1% respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.