Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40683984›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhancing cardiac disease detection via a fusion of machine learning and medical imaging.

Tao Yu, KeYue Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tao YuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, ZheJiang, China.
KeYue ChenFifth School of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University , Huzhou Cental Hospital, Huzhou, ZheJiang, China. keyuechen123@zcmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular illnesses continue to be a predominant cause of mortality globally, underscoring the necessity for prompt and precise diagnosis to mitigate consequences and healthcare expenditures. This work presents a complete hybrid methodology that integrates machine learning techniques with medical image analysis to improve the identification of cardiovascular diseases. This research integrates many imaging modalities such as echocardiography, cardiac MRI, and chest radiographs with patient health records, enhancing diagnosis accuracy beyond standard techniques that depend exclusively on numerical clinical data. During the preprocessing phase, essential visual elements are collected from medical pictures utilizing image processing methods and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). These are subsequently integrated with clinical characteristics and input into various machine learning classifiers, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, and Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), to differentiate between healthy persons and patients with cardiovascular illnesses. The proposed method attained a remarkable diagnostic accuracy of up to 96%, exceeding models reliant exclusively on clinical data. This study highlights the capability of integrating artificial intelligence with medical imaging to create a highly accurate and non-invasive diagnostic instrument for cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiagnostic ImagingHeart DiseasesImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningEchocardiographyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineAI in medicineCardiac MRICardiovascular diseaseChest radiographyDeep learningEchocardiographyHybrid diagnosisMachine learningMedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID40683984
PMCPMC12276296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.