Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40683970›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The analysis of learning investment effect for artificial intelligence English translation model based on deep neural network.

Yan Zhang, Shuangshuang Lyu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yan ZhangSchool of International Education, Jilin Engineering Normal University, Changchun, 130052, China.
Shuangshuang LyuShenyang Institute of Engineering, Shenyang, 110137, China. zhangyan1219@jlenu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid development of multimodal learning technologies, this work proposes a Future-Aware Multimodal Consistency Translation (FACT) model. This model incorporates future information guidance and multimodal consistency modeling to improve translation quality and enhance language learning efficiency. The model innovatively integrates target future contextual information with a multimodal consistency loss function, effectively capturing the interaction between text and visual information to optimize translation performance. Experimental results show that, in the English-German translation task, the FACT model outperforms the baseline model in both Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) and Meteor scores. The model achieves BLEU scores of 41.3, 32.8, and 29.6, and Meteor scores of 58.1, 52.6, and 49.6 on the Multi30K tset16, tset17, and Microsoft Common Objects in Context datasets, respectively, demonstrating its remarkable performance advantages. Significance analysis also verifies this result. Ablation experiments indicate that the future context information supervision function and multimodal consistency loss function are crucial for the model's performance. Further language learning experiments show that the FACT model significantly outperforms the Transformer model in multiple metrics, encompassing learning efficiency (83.2 words/hour) and translation quality (82.7 points), illustrating its potential in language learning applications. In short, the FACT model holds high application value in multimodal machine translation and language learning. This work provides new ideas and methods, and advances future multimodal translation technology research and applications.

Indexed as

Future information guidanceLearning investment effectMultimodal translationNeural networksVisual information

Identifiers

PMID40683970
PMCPMC12276363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.