Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40683960›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Prediction of birthweight with early and mid-pregnancy antenatal markers utilising machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence.

Manohar Pavanya, Krishnaraj Chadaga, Vennila J, Akhila Vasudeva, Bhamini Krishna Rao, Srikanth Prabhu, Shashikala K Bhat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manohar PavanyaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Dr TMA Pai Hospital (Udupi), Melaka Manipal Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Krishnaraj ChadagaManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India. krishnaraj.chadaga@manipal.edu.
Vennila JStatistics, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Akhila VasudevaDivision of Fetal Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Bhamini Krishna RaoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Srikanth PrabhuManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Shashikala K BhatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Dr TMA Pai Hospital (Udupi), Melaka Manipal Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India. shashikala.bhat@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low birthweight (LBW) is a significant health challenge worldwide, as these neonates experience both short- and long-term disabilities. Factors affecting maternal and fetal health during early to mid-pregnancy can greatly influence fetal development. Prediction of birthweight using machine learning (ML) models with antenatal data may help in better clinical management. However, the lack of explainability in these models has raised concerns within the medical community. To address this issue, our study aims to develop a more practical ML model by incorporating explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). We prospectively collected real-world clinical data of 19 maternal and fetal clinical features from 237 singleton pregnancies. Statistical analyses were conducted using Jamovi (version: 2.6.26) and JASP team (2024) JASP (version: 0.18.3). Multiple ML classifiers were employed. We developed a stacked ensemble model that integrated various algorithms, including a custom-stacked ensemble approach and three XAI methodologies: Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), and Anchor. These methods provided meaningful explanations to help construct reliable and optimal clinical predictive models. Among the ML classifiers evaluated, the AdaBoost model achieved the highest performance, with a maximum accuracy of 77%, a precision of 73%, a recall of 77%, and an F1 score of 72%. The stacked model demonstrated an accuracy of 75%, indicating its possibility in clinical application. However, the accuracy of these models might be affected by the limited dataset, which included pregnant women undergoing treatment for thyroid abnormalities, diabetes, and hypertension. Our developed model identified several key attributes that influence birthweight, such as maternal height, nuchal translucency thickness, parity, crown-rump length, glycated hemoglobin, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A. This model can assist medical professionals in making more precise birthweight predictions using routinely collected antenatal parameters, enabling timely medical decisions and treatments.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBiomarkersBirth WeightMachine LearningAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyProspective StudiesBiomarkersAntenatal careExplainable artificial intelligenceLow birthweightMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40683960
PMCPMC12276256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.