Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40683959›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Decision tree for severity assessment of neurodegenerative diseases using possibility approach and gait dynamics.

Preeti Khera, Ashok Kumar, Rajat Kapila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Preeti KheraDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Apex Institute of Technology, Chandigarh University, Mohali, 140413, Punjab, India.
Ashok KumarModel Institute of Engineering and Technology, Jammu, J&K, 181122, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1160-0154
Rajat KapilaECE Department, COE, Samara University, Samara, Ethiopia. rajatkapila@su.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and timely diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease (NDD) severity is crucial for clinical needs. Existing assessment methods for grading disease severity are mostly dependent on movement disorder specialist opinion resulting in subjectivity and inherent limitations. Gait instrumentation, on the other hand, can be used as a reliable tool to record various contrasting primary gait features. However, these features are agonized by individual's physical dimensions causing data dispersion. This study proposes normalized feature set, and a decision tree (DT) based model to evaluate NDD severity. The study investigates the use of raw sensor signals from foot resistive switches (FSR) to determine high-level gait features for detection of disease severity in patients suffering from neurodegenerative disorders. The methodology includes three-step DT-based approach. First, NDD patients were classified from healthy controls (HC). Disorders were categorized into Parkinson's disease (PD), Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and Huntington's disease (HD). Finally, disease severity was determined on clinical scale. Experimental results were established using 11,084 gait pattern recordings from NDD patients and HC. The proposed framework achieved a high coefficient of determination (R

Indexed as

Decision TreesGaitGait AnalysisNeurodegenerative DiseasesAdultAgedAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisFemaleHumansHuntington DiseaseMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseaseSeverity of Illness IndexData normalizationDecision treeDetectionDisease severityGait dynamicsNeurodegenerative diseases

Identifiers

PMID40683959
PMCPMC12276252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.