ArticleNpj mental health research2025
A randomised cross over trial examining the linguistic markers of depression and anxiety in symptomatic adults.
Article in Npj mental health research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validating objective and scalable speech markers of depression across two independent psychiatric cohorts.Annals of general psychiatry · 2026Article
- A multilevel meta-analysis of passive smartphone sensing of adolescent mental health.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Linguistic features within individuals' text data may indicate their mental health. This trial examined the linguistic markers of depressive and anxiety symptoms in adults. Using a randomised cross over trial design, 218 adults provided eight different types of text data of varying frequencies and emotional valance. Linguistic features were extracted using LIWC-22 and correlated with self-reported symptoms. Machine learning was used to determine associations. No linguistic features were consistently associated with depressive or anxiety symptoms within or across all tasks. Features associated with depressive symptoms were different for each task and there was only some degree of reliability of these features within tasks. In all machine learning models, predicted values were weakly associated with actual values. Some text tasks had lower levels of engagement and negative impacts on mood. Overall, the linguistic markers of depression and anxiety shifted in response to contextual factors and the nature of the text analysed. This trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (date registered: 15 September 2021, ACTRN12621001248853).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.